Outcomes following Treatment of Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures with Analyzing Risk Factors for the Nonunion

Soo young Jeong; Jae Ho Lee; Ki Chul Park

doi:10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.4.188

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 32(4); 2019 > Article

Original Article Outcomes following Treatment of Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures with Analyzing Risk Factors for the Nonunion: Soo young Jeong, Jae Ho Lee, Ki Chul Park; Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma 2019;32(4):188-195.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.4.188
Published online: October 31, 2019

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea. kcpark@hanyang.ac.kr

prev next

256 Views
2 Download
1 Crossref
0 Scopus

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE
Many international journals have published studies on the results of distal femoral fractures in elderly people, but only a few studies have been conducted on the Korean population. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that are associated with the outcomes and prognosis of fixation of distal femur fractures using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique in elderly patients (ageâ‰¥60) and to determine the risk factors related witht he occurrence of nonunion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study is a retrospective study. From January 2008 to June 2018, distal femur fracture (AO/OTA 33) patients who underwent surgical treatment (MIPO) were analyzed. A total of 52 patients were included in the study after removing 121 patients that met with the exclusion criteria. Medical records, including surgical records, were reviewed to evaluate the patients' underlying disease, bone mineral density, the number of days delayed from surgery, complications and mortality. In addition, follow-up radiographs were used to determine bone union, delayed union and nonunion.
RESULTS
The average time to achieve bone union was 19.95 weeks, the rate of nonunion was 20.0% (10/50) and the overall mortality was 3.8% (2/52). There were no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results of those patients with or without periprosthetic fracture. On the univariate analysis, which compared the union group vs. the nonunion group, no factors were identified as significant risk factors for nonunion. On the multiple logistic regression analysis, medical history of cancer was identified as a significant risk factor for nonunion (p=0.045).
CONCLUSION
The rate of nonunion is high in the Korean population of elderly people suffering from distal femur fracture, but the mortality rate appears to be low. A medical history of cancer is a significant risk factor for nonunion. Further prospective studies are required to determine other associated factors.

Keywords: Distal femur fracture, Periprosthetic fracture, Nonunion, Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique technique

J Korean Fract Soc. 2019 Oct;32(4):188-195. Korean.
Published online Oct 28, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.4.188

Original Article

Outcomes following Treatment of Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures with Analyzing Risk Factors for the Nonunion

Soo-young Jeong

, M.D., Jae-Ho Lee

, M.D. and Ki-Chul Park

, M.D., Ph.D.

Author information

Author notes

- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea.
Correspondence to: Ki-Chul Park, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153 Gyeongchun-ro, Guri 11923, Korea. Tel: +82-31-560-2317, Fax: +82-31-557-8781, Email: kcpark@hanyang.ac.kr

Received September 23, 2019; Revised September 30, 2019; Accepted September 30, 2019.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Many international journals have published studies on the results of distal femoral fractures in elderly people, but only a few studies have been conducted on the Korean population. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that are associated with the outcomes and prognosis of fixation of distal femur fractures using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique in elderly patients (age≥60) and to determine the risk factors related witht he occurrence of nonunion.

Materials and Methods

This study is a retrospective study. From January 2008 to June 2018, distal femur fracture (AO/OTA 33) patients who underwent surgical treatment (MIPO) were analyzed. A total of 52 patients were included in the study after removing 121 patients that met with the exclusion criteria. Medical records, including surgical records, were reviewed to evaluate the patients' underlying disease, bone mineral density, the number of days delayed from surgery, complications and mortality. In addition, follow-up radiographs were used to determine bone union, delayed union and nonunion.

Results

The average time to achieve bone union was 19.95 weeks, the rate of nonunion was 20.0% (10/50) and the overall mortality was 3.8% (2/52). There were no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results of those patients with or without periprosthetic fracture. On the univariate analysis, which compared the union group vs. the nonunion group, no factors were identified as significant risk factors for nonunion. On the multiple logistic regression analysis, medical history of cancer was identified as a significant risk factor for nonunion (p=0.045).

Conclusion

The rate of nonunion is high in the Korean population of elderly people suffering from distal femur fracture, but the mortality rate appears to be low. A medical history of cancer is a significant risk factor for nonunion. Further prospective studies are required to determine other associated factors.

Keywords

Distal femur fracture, Periprosthetic fracture, Nonunion, Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique technique

Figures

Fig. 1
Flow chart of the study population after exclusion of patients. ISS: injury severity score, IM: intramedullary, Fx.: fracture.

Download Figure

Fig. 2
A 76-year-old woman slipped down and developed a right periprosthtic distal femur fracture (A, B). We performed open reduction and internal affixation with dual plates (C, D), but after 16 months there was no sign of bone union (E, F). Although there were some fracture gaps and slightly shorter plate lengths, oligotrophic nonunion occurred and not hypertrophic nonunion. From here, we performed reoperation with changing plates with using autogenous iliac bone grafting, and union was then achieved (G, H).

Download Figure

Tables

Table 1
Baseline Characteristics and Demographics

Download Table

Table 2
Selected Comorbidities, Postoperative Outcomes, Mortality Rates and Complications

Download Table

Table 3
Comparison between the Union and Nonunion Groups

Download Table

Table 4
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Nonunion

Download Table

Notes

Financial support:None.

Conflict of interests:None.

References

1. Gwathmey FW Jr, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Kahler D, Hurwitz S, Cui Q. Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18:597–607.
1. Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, Maier A, Bühler M, Barraud GE. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury 2000;31 Suppl 3:C62–C63.
1. Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P. Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop 2018;42:191–196.
1. Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury 2001;32 Suppl 3:SC32–SC47.
1. Arneson TJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Lewallen DG, O'Fallon WM. Epidemiology of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1984. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(234):188–194.
1. Bolhofner BR, Carmen B, Clifford P. The results of open reduction and Internal fixation of distal femur fractures using a biologic(indirect) reduction technique. J Orthop Trauma 1996;10:372–377.
1. Grimes JP, Gregory PM, Noveck H, Butler MS, Carson JL. The effects of time-to-surgery on mortality and morbidity in patients following hip fracture. Am J Med 2002;112:702–709.
1. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:509–520.
1. Ebraheim NA, Martin A, Sochacki KR, Liu J. Nonunion of distal femoral fractures: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 2013;5:46–50.
1. Toro-Ibarguen A, Moreno-Beamud JA, Porras-Moreno MÁ, Aroca-Peinado M, León-Baltasar JL, Jorge-Mora AA. The number of locking screws predicts the risk of nonunion and reintervention in periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty fractures treated with a nail. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:661–664.
1. Marsh D. Concepts of fracture union, delayed union, and nonunion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;(355 Suppl):S22–S30.
1. Rodriguez EK, Boulton C, Weaver MJ, et al. Predictive factors of distal femoral fracture nonunion after lateral locked plating: a retrospective multicenter case-control study of 283 fractures. Injury 2014;45:554–559.
1. Streubel PN, Gardner MJ, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Gallagher B, Ricci WM. Are extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur too distal to fix using a lateral locked plate? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:527–534.
1. Lujan TJ, Henderson CE, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Bottlang M. Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:156–162.
1. Myers P, Laboe P, Johnson KJ, et al. Patient mortality in geriatric distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2018;32:111–115.
1. Karam J, Campbell P, David M, Hunter M. Comparison of outcomes and analysis of risk factors for non-union in locked plating of closed periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:150.
1. Faimali M, Karuppiah SV, Hassan S, Swamy G, Badhe N, Geutjens G. Mortality and morbidity associated with periprosthetic fracture after total knee replacement. J Orthop Bone Disord 2018;2:000155
1. Ricci WM, Streubel PN, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Nork SE, Gardner MJ. Risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28:83–89.
1. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Tornetta P 3rd, Koenig SJ, Maatman B. Clinical outcomes of locked plating of distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort. J Orthop Surg Res 2013;8:43.
1. Barei DP, Beingessner DM. Open distal femur fractures treated with lateral locked implants: union, secondary bone grafting, and predictive parameters. Orthopedics 2012;35:e843–e846.
1. Tomlinson RE, Silva MJ. Skeletal blood flow in bone repair and maintenance. Bone Res 2013;1:311–322.
1. Park SG, Shon OJ. Impaired bone healing metabolic and mechanical causes. J Korean Fract Soc 2017;30:40–51.
1. Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ. Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1188–1196.
1. Jordan RW, Chahal GS, Davies M, Srinivas K. A comparison of mortality following distal femoral fractures and hip fractures in an elderly population. Adv Orthop Surg 2014;2014:873785
1. Czernichow P, Thomine JM, Ertaud A, Biga N, Froment L. [Vital prognosis in fractures of the proximal femur. Study in 506 patients of 60 years of age and over]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1990;76:161–169.
  French.
1. Gregory JJ, Kostakopoulou K, Cool WP, Ford DJ. One-year outcome for elderly patients with displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck managed non-operatively. Injury 2010;41:1273–1276.
1. Ishimaru D, Ogawa H, Maeda M, Shimizu K. Outcomes of elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures according to positive criteria for surgical treatment. Orthopedics 2012;35:e353–e358.
1. Doshi HK, Wenxian P, Burgula MV, Murphy DP. Clinical outcomes of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population using locking plates with a minimally invasive approach. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2013;4:16–20.
1. Panula J, Pihlajamäki H, Mattila VM, et al. Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:105.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes for Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Compression Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
Jae Kwang Hwang, KiWon Lee, Dong-Kyo Seo, Joo-Yul Bae, Myeong-Geun Song, Hansuk Choi
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2023; 36(3): 77. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Outcomes following Treatment of Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures with Analyzing Risk Factors for the Nonunion

J Korean Fract Soc. 2019;32(4):188-195. Published online October 31, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.4.188