Hee-Gon Park; Yong-Eun Shin; Sung-Hyun Kim

doi:10.12671/jkfs.2017.30.1.9

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 30(1); 2017 > Article

Original Article
The Cause of Primary Reduction Failure in Hip Dislocation with or without Hip Fracture: Hee-Gon Park, M.D., Yong-Eun Shin, M.D., Sung-Hyun Kim, M.D.; Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2017;30(1):9-15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2017.30.1.9
Published online: January 20, 2017

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea.

Correspondence to: Hee-Gon Park, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31116, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-6290, Fax: +82-41-556-0551, arod@naver.com

• Received: March 13, 2016 • Revised: September 22, 2016 • Accepted: October 8, 2016

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

146 Views
2 Download
1 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
NOTES
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
A rapid and accurate reduction is important for hip dislocated patients to avoid various potential complications, including avascular necrosis of the femoral head. We analyzed hip dislocation cases, ones that particularly failed during the primary reduction trial.
Materials and Methods
Eighty-seven patients with hip dislocation, who visited the emergency department between January 2007 and September 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Of them, 68 patients were successfully treated in the first closed reduction trial, and the remaining 19 patients were unsuccessful. Of the 19 unsuccessful first trial, 12 patients were successfully treated in the second closed reduction; however, in the remaining 7 patients, open reduction was performed in the operation room with general anesthesia. Every closed reduction was practiced by at least 2 orthopedic doctors, and open reduction was performed by a single senior author.
Results
The rate of first reduction failure was higher, with statistical significance, in patients aged under 50 years, male gender, and those with combined around hip fractures, including femoral head and acetabular fracture (p<0.05). In particular, the presence of impacted fracture fragment in the hip joint and large size of the impacted fracture fragment was highly related to the failure of second closed reduction trial requiring open reduction. Conversely, the method of reduction, Thompson-Epstein classification, Pipkin classification were not related to the failure of closed reduction statistically (p>0.05).
Conclusion
To evaluate the patients with hip dislocation, realizing the type of dislocation, presence of accompanied fracture, location and size of fracture fragment, age, as well as gender of patients is important. If the fracture fragment is impacted in the hip joint and the size of the fragment is large, then the operative treatment is considered, rather than the repetitive trial of closed reduction by constraint.
Key words: Hip joint, Dislocation, Fracture, Closed reduction, Reduction failure

None.

REFERENCES

1. Campbell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2013.
2. Moed BR, Reilly MC. Acetabulum fractures. In: Bucholz RW, Court Brown CM, Heckman JD, , editors. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 1463-1523.
3. Rosenthal RE, Coker WL. Posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip: an epidemiologic review. J Trauma, 1979;19:572-581.PubMed
4. Sah AP, Marsh E. Traumatic simultaneous asymmetric hip dislocations and motor vehicle accidents. Orthopedics, 2008;31:613. PubMed
5. Sanders S, Tejwani N, Egol KA. Traumatic hip dislocation--a review. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 2010;68:91-96.PubMed
6. Hougaard K, Thomsen PB. Traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip: prognostic factors influencing the incidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1986;106:32-35.Article PubMed PDF
7. Paus B. Traumatic dislocations of the; late results in 76 cases. Acta Orthop Scand, 1951;21:99-112.PubMed
8. Stewart MJ, Milford LW. Fracture-dislocation of the; an endresult study. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1954;36:315-342.PubMed
9. Brav EA. Traumatic dislocation of the hip: Army experience and results over a twelve-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962;44:1115-1134.
10. Tornetta P 3rd, Mostafavi HR. Hip dislocation: current treatment regimens. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1997;5:27-36.PubMed
11. Thompson VP, Epstein HC. Traumatic dislocation of the; a survey of two hundred and four cases covering a period of twenty-one years. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1951;33:746-778.PubMed
12. Proctor H. Dislocations of the hip joint (excluding 'central' dislocations) and their complications. Injury, 1973;5:1-12.PubMed
13. Hunter GA. Posterior dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip. A review of fifty-seven patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1969;51:38-44.PubMed
14. Paterson I. The torn acetabular labrum; a block to reduction of a dislocated hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1957;39:306-309.PubMed
15. Thompson SM. Traumatic dislocation of the hip. In proceedings of the Sheffield regional orthopaedic club. J Bone and Joint Surg, 1960;42:858.
16. Epstein HC, Harvey JP. Traumatic anterior dislocation of the hip. Management and results. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1972;54:1561-1570.
17. Pipkin G. Treatment of grade IV fracture-dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1957;39:1027-1042.PubMed
18. Keith JE Jr, Brashear HR Jr, Guilford WB. Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Quantitative assessment using computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1988;70:711-714.
19. Magu NK, Magu S, Rohilla RK, Batra A, Jaipuria A, Singh A. Computed tomographic evaluation of the proximal femur: a predictive classification in displaced femoral neck fracture management. Indian J Orthop, 2014;48:476-483.
20. Canale ST, Manugian AH. Irreducible traumatic dislocations of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1979;61:7-14.PubMed
21. Mullis BH, Dahners LE. Hip arthroscopy to remove loose bodies after traumatic dislocation. J Orthop Trauma, 2006;20:22-26.PubMed
22. Lima LC, do Nascimento RA, de Almeida VM, Façanha Filho FA. Epidemiology of traumatic hip dislocation in patients treated in Ceará, Brazil. Acta Ortop Bras, 2014;22:151-154.PubMed PMC
23. Alonso JE, Volgas DA, Giordano V, Stannard JP. A review of the treatment of hip dislocations associated with acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000;(377):32-43.
24. Sahin V, Karakaş ES, Aksu S, Atlihan D, Turk CY, Halici M. Traumatic dislocation and fracture-dislocation of the hip: a long-term follow-up study. J Trauma, 2003;54:520-529.PubMed
25. Brock G. The occasional posterior hip dislocation reduction. Can J Rural Med, 2015;20:65-70.
26. Dwyer AJ, John B, Singh SA, Mam MK. Complications after posterior dislocation of the hip. Int Orthop, 2006;30:224-227.
27. Terjesen T, Horn J, Gunderson RB. Fifty-year follow-up of late-detected hip dislocation: clinical and radiographic outcomes for seventy-one patients treated with traction to obtain gradual closed reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014;96:e28.
28. Pan J, Bredella MA. Imaging of soft tissue abnormalities about the hip. Radiol Clin North Am, 2013;51:353-369.

Fig. 1

Measurement method of volume of the bone fragment.

Fig. 2

Overview of cases. ER: emergency room, OR: operation room.

Fig. 3

Relationship between 2nd closed reduction failure and volume of the bone fragment.

Fig. 4

Case: Closed reduction was interrupted by a large bone fragment.

Table 1

Patient Distribution of Age

Values are presented as number only or number (%). The sum of the percentages does not equal 100% because of rounding.

Table 2

Injury Mechanism

TA: traffic accident, Others: bicycle accident, slip down, crushing injury, etc.

Table 3

Relationship between Age and First Reduction Failure

Table 4

Relationship between Reduction Method and First Reduction Failure

Table 5

Odds Ratio of First Reduction Failure by Logistic Regression Analysis

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Traumatic obturator dislocation of the hip joint: About 2 cases and review of the literature
Z.F. Zengui, O. El Adaoui, M. Fargouch, O. Adnane, Y. El Andaloussi, M. Fadili
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 93: 106983. CrossRef

Cite

CITE: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

The Cause of Primary Reduction Failure in Hip Dislocation with or without Hip Fracture

J Korean Fract Soc. 2017;30(1):9-15. Published online January 31, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2017.30.1.9

XML Download

Figure

We recommend

Related articles

Risk Factors of Fixation Failure in Femoral Neck Fractures

The Cause of Primary Reduction Failure in Hip Dislocation with or without Hip Fracture

Fig. 1 Measurement method of volume of the bone fragment.

Fig. 2 Overview of cases. ER: emergency room, OR: operation room.

Fig. 3 Relationship between 2nd closed reduction failure and volume of the bone fragment.

Fig. 4 Case: Closed reduction was interrupted by a large bone fragment.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

The Cause of Primary Reduction Failure in Hip Dislocation with or without Hip Fracture

Table 1

Patient Distribution of Age

Values are presented as number only or number (%). The sum of the percentages does not equal 100% because of rounding.

Table 2

Injury Mechanism

TA: traffic accident, Others: bicycle accident, slip down, crushing injury, etc.

Table 3

Relationship between Age and First Reduction Failure

Table 4

Relationship between Reduction Method and First Reduction Failure

Table 5

Odds Ratio of First Reduction Failure by Logistic Regression Analysis

Table 1 Patient Distribution of Age

Values are presented as number only or number (%). The sum of the percentages does not equal 100% because of rounding.

Table 2 Injury Mechanism

TA: traffic accident, Others: bicycle accident, slip down, crushing injury, etc.

Table 3 Relationship between Age and First Reduction Failure

Table 4 Relationship between Reduction Method and First Reduction Failure

Table 5 Odds Ratio of First Reduction Failure by Logistic Regression Analysis