Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > > Volume 12(4); 1999 > Article
Original Article
Analysis of cause of collapse and Non-union After Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture
Seung Woo Suh, Chang Ryong Hur, Jung Ho Park, Jun Seok Hong, Woo Nam Moon
Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures 1999;12(4):812-817.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1999.12.4.812
Published online: June 23, 2016

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Korea.

Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society

  • 46 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • Sixty-five Intertrochanteric hip fractures were analyzed radiologically to study the factors affecting postoperati ye stability. Fractures were evaluated by measuring shortening and angulation, collapse of telescoping device when utilized, and migration of the fixation device within the femoral head. Fractures were classified according to their stability preoperatively and the reduction of lessor trochanteric fracture fragment postoperatively. The failure rate and postoperative stability were then compared on terms of severity of osteoporosis, type of fracture, existence of reduction of lestor trochanter fragment. Results indicated that the severity of osteoporosis was not related to the group of fracture, which determines stability of fracture. Regarding the rate of bone union, anatomically reduced groups showed similar rates of bone union(73.8% in average) and degree of sliding of lag screw (4.13mm in average) regardless of fixation of lesser trochanter fragment. On the other hand, malreduced group which failed to obtain anatomical reduction had 26.1% of bone union rates and 10.95mm of sliding of lag screw representing importance of anatomical reduction rather than fixation of lesser trochanteric fracture. In conclusion, there was no correlationthip between severity of oLteoporosis and type of fracture. And it is suggested that unstabae intertrochanteric fractures accompanied by large lesser trochanteric fracture fragment can be provided stability avoiding major complications such as loosening of implant or collapse of fracture fragment if it is fixed with anatomical reduction of fracture even without the fixation of lesser trochanteric fragment.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Analysis of cause of collapse and Non-union After Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture
        J Korean Soc Fract. 1999;12(4):812-817.   Published online October 31, 1999
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      We recommend
      Analysis of cause of collapse and Non-union After Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture
      Analysis of cause of collapse and Non-union After Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture

      J Korean Soc Fract : Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures
      Close layer
      TOP