Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Musculoskelet Trauma > Volume 19(3); 2006 > Article
Original Article
Wedge Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated with Interlocking IM Nailing
Sang Jun Song, Hyung Ku Yoon, Soo Hong Han, Hyung Kun Park, In Seok Lee
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2006;19(3):322-328.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2006.19.3.322
Published online: June 16, 2016

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bundang CHA Hospital, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Tesstore@empal.com

Copyright © The Korean Fracture Society. All rights reserved

  • 461 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next
  • PURPOSE: To investigate the bone union time of patients treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing in wedged tibial shaft fracture and to evaluate the factors that influence this result. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 patients treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing for wedge tibial shaft fracture were reviewed with a follow-up period of more than 1 year. Radiographic results were assessed with diameter (%) and length (mm) of wedge fragment, pre and postoperative displacement (mm) of wedge fragment. We also checked the bone union time of the main fragment and the wedge fragment (paired t-test). We investigated the bone union time acocording to the diameter, length of wedge fragment, pre and postopertvie displacement (correlation analysis). RESULTS: Bone union time of the main fragments averaged 15.3 weeks (6~53 weeks) and that of wedge fragment averaged 24.2 weeks (8~64 weeks) (p=0.005). There was no correspondence between wedge fragment diameter and bone union time (p=0.681), but the bone union time of wedge fragment increased in proportion to its diameter (r2=0.747, p=0.031). There was no correspondence between preoperative displacement of wedge fragment and bone union time (p=0.574), but the bone union time increased in proportion to postoperative displacement of wedge fragment (r2=0.730, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Wedge fragments need longer time for bone union than main fragments in interlocking intramedullary nailing for wedge tibial shaft fractures. We need to pay attention to the displacemet of fragments in treating tibial shaft fractures with large wedge fragment.

Figure & Data

REFERENCES

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • RNA modifications: molecular orchestrators of wound healing
      Xiuying Guo, Lele Liu, Junqi Yang, Yuhe Dai, Qianbo Zhang, Rifang Gu, Min Tan, Ming Tang, Xuqiang Nie
      Burns & Trauma.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef

    • Cite
      CITE
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Wedge Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated with Interlocking IM Nailing
      J Korean Fract Soc. 2006;19(3):322-328.   Published online July 31, 2006
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    We recommend
    Wedge Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated with Interlocking IM Nailing
    Wedge Tibial Shaft Fractures Treated with Interlocking IM Nailing

    J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
    Close layer
    TOP