Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Comparative Study

Treatment of Acromioclayicular Dislocation-Comparative Study between Operative and Conservative Method: Young Su Lee, Min Ki Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 1997;10(4):918-924. Published online October 31, 1997; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1997.10.4.918

Abstract PDF: There has been considerable controversy as to the method of treatment of acromioclavicular joint especially in grade III injury. We treated 27 cases of the complete dislocation of acromioclavicular dislocation with operative method(15 cases) and conservative method(12 cases) from October 1989 to November 1995. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological result of two treatment method. The average follow up period was thirty nine months and the result as follows. 1. Of the 27 cases, there was 18 male and 9 female patients, and peak incidence was in 3rd and 4th decades(51%). 2. The most common causes of the injury was traffic atcident(49%). 3. The functional results were similiar to all treatment modalities, and coracoclavicular interval ratio was well manintained regardless of treatment. 4. Complication rate was more lower in the group of conservative treatment. 5. The conservative treatment was proven to be a valuable method for acromioclavicular dis- location except in a few situations.

Original Article

A Operative treatment of the three-part, four-part Fracture and Fracture dislocation in proximal humerus: Young Su Lee, Min Ki Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 1997;10(1):112-118. Published online January 31, 1997; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1997.10.1.112

Abstract PDF: The three part, four part fracture and fracture-dislocation of proximal humerus generally need operative treatment but treatment of these fractures has remained controversal. The purpose of this study is to analyze the result of operative treatment of three-part, four-part fracture and fracture dislocation in proximal humerus. From Jan 1990 to July 1995, Eleven patiens were reviewed and the result were summerized as follows. 1. There were 4 three-part fracture, 1 four-part fracture, 4 three-part fracture-dislocation, 1 head-spliting fracture, 1 impression fracture. 2. Open reduction and internal fixation was done in 7 cases, prothetic replacement was done in 4 cases. 3. The result were analyzed accroding to scoring system of Neer. 1) The excellent or satisfactory result were seen in 5 cases of three part fracture and fracture-dislocation, but in none case of four-part fracture. 2) The excellent or satisfactory result were seen in 3 cases with open reduction and internal fixation, and in 3 cases with prothetic replacement. 4. Among the cases with joint disability(5), there are 1 three-part fracture-dislocation, 1 head-spliting, 2 three-part fracture, 1 four-part fracture. 5. The rigid fixation and early mobilization is considered to be a good modality.

Search