Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Ward triangle"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Differences of Bone Mineral Density between Spine and Hip in Osteoporotic Patients
Gyu Min Kong, Sang Eon Lee, Dong Jun Kim, Tae Hyun Yoon
J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18(2):181-184.   Published online April 30, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2005.18.2.181
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To evaluate differences and correlations of spine and hip region BMD in osteoporotic patients with or without spine fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 1999 to December 2002, We measured and evaluated BMD of L3 and hip by DXA in 52 patients with spine fracture (fracture group) and 96 osteoporotic patients without spine fracture (non-fracture group) above 60 years.
RESULTS
The average age of patients with spine fracture is 72.1 years and without spine fracture is 66.9 years. There were no statistical significant differences of BMD of spine, neck of femur and trochanteric area between 2 groups. But the BMD of Ward triangle of fracture group decreased significantly in statistics. The correlation coefficient between the lumbar spine and trochanteric area were 0.674 in fracture group and 0.794 in non-fracture group. They had statistical significance (<0.01).
CONCLUSION
The BMD of Ward triangle of fracture group had lower value, but the BMD of lumbar spine had no differences between 2 groups. Therefore in these persons who have decreased BMD in Ward triangle should be concerned about high vertebral compression fracture risk vertebral compression fracture.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of vertebral and femoral bone mineral density in adult females
    Han Seong Choe, Jae Hong Lee, Dong Ki Min, So Hong Shin
    Journal of Physical Therapy Science.2016; 28(6): 1928.     CrossRef
  • Functional Outcomes of Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures with or without Osteoporosis
    Ki-Chan An, Gyu-Min Kong, Jang-Seok Choi, Hi-Chul Gwak, Joo-Yong Kim, Sung-Yub Jin
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(4): 248.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Patients over 65 Years according to Presence and Types of Hip Fracture
    Myung-Ho Kim, Moon-Jib Yoo, Joong-Bae Seo, Hyun-Yul Yoo, Sang-Young Moon
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(3): 263.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Patients according to Presence of Intertrochanteric Fracture
    Sang Ho Moon, Byoung Ho Suh, Dong Joon Kim, Gyu Min Kong, Hyeon Guk Cho
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(3): 222.     CrossRef
  • 457 View
  • 0 Download
  • 4 Crossref
Close layer
Diffrences of Bone Mineral Density between Osteoporotic Group with or without Compression Fracture of the Spine
Eu Sub Jung, Young Ki Lee, Seung Ill Baek
J Korean Soc Fract 1998;11(3):629-633.   Published online July 31, 1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1998.11.3.629
AbstractAbstract PDF
Osteoporosis is the metabolic bone disease and the bone is easily fracture by minimal stress due to decreased bone mass. It gets to attract more and more interest due to surprisingly high incidence and prevalence as well as its complications, fracture. We compared the bone mineral density between 45 osteoporotic patients group with compression fractures of the spine, 105 osteoporotic patients group without fractures and 45 normal control group using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. We obtained following results. 1. There are statistically no significant differences between bone mineral density of the osteoporotic group with compression fracture of the spine and bone mineral density of the osteoporotic group without fractures. 2. Height and weight had statistically significant correlation with bone mineral density of the lumbar spine anteroposterior view, lateral view and Ward triangle. 3. Fracture threshold of the lumbar spine anteroposterior view, lateral wiew and Ward triangle are 0.884g/cm2, 0.694g/cm2 and 0.514g/cm2 according to 90percentile, 0.979g/cm2, 0.732g/cm2, 0.545g/cm2 according to 95percentile.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Subsequent Hip Fracture in Osteoporotic Hip Fracture Patients
    Sang Ho Lee, Tong Joo Lee, Kyu Jung Cho, Sang Hyun Shin, Kyoung Ho Moon
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2012; 53(5): 1005.     CrossRef
  • 354 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
Close layer
TOP