Search
- Page Path
-
HOME
> Search
Original Articles
-
Additional Hinged External Fixation in Complex Elbow Injury
-
Tong Joo Lee, Taek Ho Hong, Nak Chul Kim
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2015;28(3):169-177. Published online July 31, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2015.28.3.169
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of hinged external fixation in management of complex elbow injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes in 10 patients with elbow dislocation and associated fractures of both the radial head and the coronoid process from January 2007 to December 2013. All ten patients were treated by hinged external fixation after open reduction and internal fixation. The indication for use of a hinged external fixator was persistent instability after fixation of the fractures. Early mobilization was started at 1 week (6.5 days) after surgery. The external fixator was removed at 6 weeks after surgery. Cassebaum classification and Mayo elbow performance score were used for clinical and functional evaluation. The follow-up period was at least 1 year.
RESULTS
At the last follow-up, the average further flexion was 127degrees, and the average flexion contracture was 16degrees. The average pronation was 83degrees and the average supination was 78degrees. By the Cassebaum classification after 1 year follow-up, patients were classified as 4 excellent, 4 good, and 2 poor. According to the Mayo elbow performance score, the average score was 87 points (65-100 points) with 3 excellent, 6 good, and 1 fair. Stability was restored in all patients at the last follow-up. There was no case of nonunion and the average union period was 11.5 weeks.
CONCLUSION
This study advocated the additional use of a hinged external fixator in the treatment of complex elbow instability, especially when fixation of fractures and repair of soft tissues were not sufficient. Providing adequate stability and allowing early motion, additional external fixation could improve the functional outcome.
-
Elbow Dislocation Combined with Coronoid Process and Radial Head Fracture
-
Sung Tae Lee, Jin Hyung Choi, Joong Bae Seo, Jin Young Park
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18(4):437-442. Published online October 31, 2005
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2005.18.4.437
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- PURPOSE
To evaluate the clinical outcome for terrible triad injury of the elbow joint.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed consecutive 10 cases retrospectively among 12 terrible triad injuries, which had been followed up for a minimum 1 year. The average age at the time of injury was 45 years (range, 32~72). All cases were dislocated posteriorly. The 3 cases had fracture of olecranon. Combined medial and lateral approach was performed in 3 cases, medial and lateral approach after extensile posterior approach in 4 cases, transolecranon approach using existed olecranon fracture in 2 cases, and transolecranon approach in 1 case were done.
RESULTS
The average Mayo elbow performance score was 87, with 5 excellent, 4 good, and 1 poor results. Results by Riseborough and Radin's rating criteria include 9 good and 1 fair. The 8 cases were stable. But 2 cases were classified with moderate and severe instability; these cases had been performed by radial head allograft and excision respectively.
CONCLUSION
A stable, functional elbow can be restored in terrible triad injury by early active rehabilitation after anatomic reduction and firm internal fixation.
TOP