Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Articles

Treatment of the Distal Metaphyseal Fractures of Tibia - Comparison between Internal Fixation with a Plate and screws and External Fixation with Ilizarov Device: Sung Churl Lee, Moon Jib Yoo, Hyun Seok Seo; J Korean Soc Fract 2002;15(3):371-378. Published online July 31, 2002; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2002.15.3.371

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to compare the results between open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws and closed reduction and external fixation with Ilizarov device for the fracture of disatal metaphyseal fracture of tibia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, the results in treatment of the 19 distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia with closed reduction and external fixation with Ilizarov device were compared with those in treatment of the 23 fractures with open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screws. The cases were the patients who had been treated for the fractures at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dankook University Hospital from May 1997 to December 2000. The results of treatment were analysed using functional evaluation by Mast and Teipner and radiological evaluation by Ovadia and Beals.
RESULTS
The results were as follows: 1. The major causes of injury were motor vehecle accidents, fall-downs, and falls from a height in order. 2. Treatment of the fractures with closed reduction and external fixation with Ilizarov device showed comparable results to that with open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screws. 3. Complications in treatment were a little more frequent in open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screws than in closed reduction and external fixation with Ilizarov device.
CONCLUSION
Considering the results, closed reduction and external fixation with Ilizarov device is thought to be one of recommendable options in treatment of the distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia with the advantages in wound management, prevention of stiffness of ankle joint, and convenience in removal of the device.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Mid-term Results of Distal Tibial Fractures Treated with Ilizarov External Fixator
Suk Kyu Choo, Kyung Wook Nha, Hyoung Keun Oh, Dong Bong Lee
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(4): 323. CrossRef

119 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

Pitfalls in Treatment of Lateral Malleolar Frcture with Plate and Screws: Jong Min Sohn, Ju Hae Jahng, Nan Kyung Ha, Dae Hyun Baek, Hyoung Gwan Kim, Bong Heon Hyun; J Korean Soc Fract 1998;11(4):900-905. Published online October 31, 1998; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1998.11.4.900

Abstract PDF

The goal in treatment of ankle fracture is the restoration of normal ankle function. Although controversy still exists over the best method of treatment, recent ariticles emphasize importance of the anatomic reduction of fibula and the benefits of early mobilization when adequate fixation is accomplished. When we fix fracture of lateral alleolus with plte and screws, the distal screws should engage the medial cortex of the fibula but not protrude into the talofibular joint. Because the penetration of screws into ankle joint may be the cause of postoperative pain and opst-traumatic arthritis. This article has reviewed a series of 36 ankle fractures, treated from March 1993 to January 1997, using plate and screws. In order to analyse the influence of the penetration of screws into the ankle joint, all fractures were classified according to the penetrating length of screw from medial cortex of lateral malleolus. Thse with the end of the screw protnided more than 2mm into joint were clssified group I, those with less than 2mm groupp II, those with no engagement group III. The results obtained from this study were as follows: 1. According to clinical and radiolgraphic assessment of the results of the treatment, open reduction and internal fixation using plate and screws in treatment of lateral malleous was a satisfactory method. The excellent or good results were achieved in 28 patients among the 36 patients (77.8%). 2. Average time of bony union was not different significally among the three groups. 3. The gain of full range of motion was delayed in group I. 4. Patients of group I complained persistent pain and discomfort more frequently than the other groups. 5. In the treatment of lateral malleolar fracture, the distal screws should engage the medial cortex of fibula to gain firm fixation,but should not protrude more than 2mm into the ankle joint.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Features of Lateral Malleolar Fractures in Elderly Patients and Clinical Outcome of Locking Compression Plate Fixation
Seok-Min Hwang, Hong-Geun Jung, Hyung-Jin Chung, Joon-Sang Eom, Dong-Oh Lee, Jung-Hyun Cho, Jong-Tae Park
Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association.2016; 51(1): 77. CrossRef

126 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

The Treatment of the Proximal Tibia Fracture -Comparison of the Variable Method of Fixation-: Dong Heon Kim, Kyu cheol Shin, Kyeong Soon Kim, Byeong Chun Chang, Dae Sul Kang; J Korean Soc Fract 1998;11(2):442-448. Published online April 30, 1998; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1998.11.2.442

Abstract PDF: The treatment of proximal tibial fracture is an area of great controversy. Because open and comminuted fractures are common, selection of fixation method of the proximal tibial fracture is more difficult than any other fractures. Many authors reported high rate of malunion and loss of reduction. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of the proximal tibial fractures depending on the fixation method. We evaluated the records of 35 patients (36 fractures) who had been treated with intramedullary nailing, plate and screws and external fixation from January 1989 to January 1996. The mean period of follow-up was 12months. Of the 36 fractures, 8 fractures were with intramedullary nailing, 12 fractures with plate and screws, 16 fractures with external fixator. In intramedullary nailing groupp, the average time of bony union was nineteen weeks (16-27), in plate and screws fixation group twenty three weeks (18-31) and in external fixation group 22 weeks (19-29). The complications of intramedullary nailing group were 3 nonunions, 1 delayed union, 1 varus deformity, 2 anterior angulations and 2 cases of deep wound infection. The complications of plate and screws group were 1 nonunion, 3 delayed union, 1 deep wound infection, 2 superficial infections and in most fractures partial stiffiness of knee joint. The complications of external fixator group were 1 nonunion, 1 delayed union, 1 deep wound infection, 6 pin tract infections and 3 cases of knee joint stiffness. In our cases, if there is open wound higher than Gustilo grade III-B and severe comminuted fracture initially, the external fixation is more preferred for wound management and also more advantageous method for the patients who got a multiple trauma in abdomen, chest and head injuries. In closed fractures and Gustilo grade I, II open fractures, intramedullary nailing is considered to be more preferable method. But the anatomy of proximal tibia made nailing these fractures technically difficult. In conclusion, we consider each method of fixation is useful fixation method of the proximal tibial fractures, but each method should be selected advertently depending on the severity of soft tissue injury and the degree of comminution of the fractures.

58 View
0 Download

Treatment of Nonunion of the Tibia Fracture: Dong Heon Kim, Kyu Cheol Shin, Hee Cheol Park, Ju Yong Shin; J Korean Soc Fract 1996;9(1):112-118. Published online January 31, 1996; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1996.9.1.112

Abstract PDF: Nonunion after tibia fracture is a relatively common problem. The cases of nonunion have been known open and comunited fracture, extensive soft tissue injury, interposition of the soft tissue, distarbance of the blood supply and inadequate fixation. A number of methods stimulating union have born described. These include fibular osteotomy followed by weight-bearing in a cast, autogenous boone graft with or without additional stabilization, internal or external fixation with compression, open or closed IM nailing and even electromagetic stimulation. In this paper we carried out retrospective study of the 24 nonunion of the tibia fracture which were treated at the Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Kon-Kuk University Hospital from March 1990 to March 1995. The results were as follows: 1. Among 24 cases of monunions, 16cases(66.6%) were communited fractures and 18cases(75%) were open fractures. 2. Hypervascular nonunion were 12cases and avascular nonunion were 12cases. Previous methods of treatinent were conservative treatment in 6cases of closed fracture and were treated with Ender nailing, multiple K-wire fixation, Ilizarolr external fixation, monofixator external fixation in 1 Bcases of open fractures. 3. The average duration from injury to dignosis of nonunion was 7 months tweets.(Range 5 months to 24months) 4. Tibial nonunion were treated with plate and screw with bone graft(Bcases), Interlocking IM nail ing(14cases), and nizarov external fixation with bone graft(teases). 5. The average time of union was 23weeks in all patients: 24 weeks in the case of plate and screw with bone graft. 20 weeks in the case of interlocking IM nailing. 28 weeks in the case Ilizarov external fixation with bone graft. 6. The main complications were joint stiffness due to long-term cast irnrnobiliBation in the case of plate and screw with bone graft, LROM of joint contracture and external pin site in the case of Ilizarov external fixation with bone graft, deep infection Icase and knee joint pain teases due to proximal nail protrusion in the case of Interlocking IM nailing.

96 View
0 Download

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search