Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Articles

Analysis of the Result Treated with Locking Compression Plate-Distal Tibia and Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate in Distal Tibia Fracture: Jun Young Lee, Sang Ho Ha, Sung Won Cho, Sung Hae Park; J Korean Fract Soc 2013;26(2):118-125. Published online April 30, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.2.118

PURPOSE
To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive plate, osteosynthesis, using either a locking compression plate-distal tibia (LCP-DT) or Zimmer periarticular locking plate (ZPLP) for distal tibia fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty one patients (51 cases), who underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis using locking compression plate for distal tibia fractures between October 2008 and August 2011, were followed for more than six months. Eighteen patients were treated with LCP-DT and 33 patients with ZPLP. Time to bony union and anatomic alignment were evaluated radiologically. Clinically, American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scales (AOFAS score) and range of ankle motion were assessed and compared between two groups.
RESULTS
All patients achieved bony union at an average of 18 weeks on LCP-DT group and 16weeks on ZPLP group. The average American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scales was 83.3 points on the LCP-DT group, 84.6 points on the ZPLP group, and range of ankle motion averaged at 45 degrees, 48 degrees, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both types of locking compression plates were effective when performing minimally invasive osteosynthesis for distal tibia fractures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Biomechanical analysis and clinical effects of bridge combined fixation system for femoral fractures
Da-xing Wang, Ying Xiong, Hong Deng, Fu Jia, Shao Gu, Bai-lian Liu, Qun-hui Li, Qi Pu, Zhong-zi Zhang
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2014; 228(9): 899. CrossRef

97 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

Comparison of Results of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis according to Types of Locking Plate in Distal Femoral Fractures: Oog Jin Shon, Moon Soo Kwon, Chul Hyun Park; J Korean Fract Soc 2012;25(4):269-276. Published online October 31, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2012.25.4.269

Abstract PDF

PURPOSE
To compare results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a locking compression plate and a periarticular locking plate in distal femur fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 31 consecutive femoral fractures who treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis from April 2006 to May 2009. Sixteen patients were treated using a locking compression plate (group A) and 15 patients were treated using a periarticular locking plate (group B).
RESULTS
The mean operation time was 78 minutes and 76 minutes (p=0.273), and the mean radiation exposure time was 1.9 minutes and 2.3 minutes (p=0.001) in the group A and B, respectively. The plate bending during operation was performed in 4 cases of group A. The knee range of motion was 117.5degrees and 118.2degrees (p=0.825), and the Lysholm score was 81.3 and 81.8 (p=0.723) in the group A and B, respectively. Schazker criteria showed more than good grade in 93.8% of group A and in 93.3% of group B (p=1.0).
CONCLUSION
No significant differences in clinical results were observed between the two groups. However, a lower anatomical compliance was showed in the locking compression plate, and a higher risk of radiation exposure was showed in the periarticular locking plate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta‐analysis
Byung-Ho Yoon, In Keun Park, Youngwoo Kim, Hyoung-Keun Oh, Suk Kyu Choo, Yerl-Bo Sung
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2021; 141(2): 225. CrossRef
The Mid-Term Result after Osteosynthesis of Intra-Articular Fractures of Distal Femur
Sam Guk Park, Jeong Jae Moon, Oog Jin Shon
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2016; 29(4): 242. CrossRef

144 View
0 Download
2 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search