Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Open plate fixation"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
The Comparison of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis versus Open Plate Fixation in the Treatment of in the Distal Femur Fracture
Seong Jun Ahn, Suk Woong Kang, Bu Hwan Kim, Moo Ho Song, Seong Ho Yoo, Kwan Taek Oh
J Korean Fract Soc 2013;26(4):314-320.   Published online October 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2013.26.4.314
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of surgical treatment through retrospective comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) vs open plate fixation in the treatment of the distal femur fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-one patients with distal femur fractures from January 2002 to December 2010 were divided into two groups depending on the surgical method. Minimum follow up was 12 months. Group A consisted of 17 patients treated with MIPPO, and group B was comprised of 14 patients treated with open plate fixation. Clinical outcomes including operation time, transfusion rate, rehabilitation, range of motion, and interval change of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) were evaluated to assess postoperative inflammatory reaction, postoperative complications and clinical results with the use of Sanders criteria.
RESULTS
The operative time was 86/135 min and transfusion volume was 0.8/1.9 unit respectively. The postoperative 3-day and 7-day CRP were 7.4/1.5 mg% in group A and 10.3/2.4 mg% in group B, showing more minimal tissue injury and early recovery in group A. There were no significant differences in clinical results by Sanders criteria in both groups.
CONCLUSION
Both MIPPO and open plate fixation for the treatment of distal femur fractures showed comparably good results. However, the MIPPO technique is superior to group B in view of minimal tissue injury and operation time and was proven to lessen the transfusion rate.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Usefulness of Reduction and Internal Fixation Using a 2.4 mm Hand Plating System in Type AO 33-A3 Distal Femur Fracture: Technical Note
    Bong-Ju Lee, Ja-Yeong Yoon, Seungha Woo
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2023; 36(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • 153 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer
The Comparison of MIPPO vs Open Plate Fixation in the Treatment of the Distal Tibia Fracture
Seong Ho Yoo, Seong Jun Ahn, Moo Ho Song, Bu Hwan Kim, Min Soo Lee, Jong Ha Park
J Korean Fract Soc 2006;19(1):29-33.   Published online January 31, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2006.19.1.29
AbstractAbstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of the surgical treatment through the comparison of MIPPO vs open plate fixation in the treatment of the distal tibia fracture retrospectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
30 patients with distal tibia fracture from Jun. 2001 to Jun. 2004 were divided into two groups depending on the surgical method. Minimum follow up was 12 months. Group A consisted of 15 patients treated with MIPPO, Group B was 15 patients treated with open plate fixation. The clinical outcomes were evaluated retrospectively from operation time, rehabilitation, ROM, interval change of postoperative CRP to assess postoperative inflammatory reaction, postoperative complications and clinical result with the use of McLennan and Ungersma criteria.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in clinical result by McLennan and Ungersma criteria in both groups. The postoperative 3 days and 7 days CRP were 4.0mg% (0.9~7.2)/0.5 mg% (0.1~1.5) in group A and 7.97mg% (2.8~14.6)/1.0mg% (0.3~1.6) in group B, shows more minimal tissue injury and early recovery in group A. Operation time in group A was shorter than group B. Normal recovery of ROM was quicker in Group A. In complications, group A showed one superficial infection and one angular deformity and group B showed one superficial infection, one infected nonunion and two ankle stiffness.
CONCLUSION
There were no significant differences in clinical result and bony union. MIPPO technique is superior to group B in view of the minimal tissue injury, complications, operation time and postoperative rehabilitation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis Using a Lateral Plate in Distal Tibial Fracture
    Oog Jin Shon, Dae Sung Kim
    Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • 85 View
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
Close layer

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
Close layer
TOP