Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Article

A Comparison of Interlocking Nail with Wiring versus Plate Fixation in Long Oblique or Spiral Fractures of Humeral Shaft: Phil Hyun Chung, Sang Ho Moon; J Korean Soc Fract 2000;13(3):555-561. Published online July 31, 2000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2000.13.3.555

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To compare functional results between interlocking intramedullary nail with wiring and plate for treating long oblique or spiral diaphyseal fractures of humerus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From April 1996 to February 1999, 9 long oblique or spiral fractures were treated with antegrade humeral locked nails and wiring after minimal open reduction, and another 9 fractures were fixed with plate and screws. Average age of patients was 45.8 years and average follow-up was 13.5 months.
RESULTS
Nail group showed earlier clinical and radiologic union than plate and screw group. All patients with plate and screw group(plate fixation) had clinical union within 5.8+/-2.5 weeks and radiologic union within 8.5+/-2.1 weeks. But, all patients with wiring had clinical union within 2.8+/-0.6 weeks and radiologic union within 5.5 +/-1.6 weeks. At last follow-up, average range of shoulder motion in plate group was larger than nailing group, but that was stastically insignificant. Plate fixations had more complications than nailing, for example, deep infection, non-union, implant failure and radial nerve injury.
CONCLUSION
Interlocking intramedullary nail with wiring has the advantages of minimal tissue trauma and scar formation, sufficient reduction and fixation, early union and fewer complication. So it can be a worthy alternative for the treatment of long oblique or spiral fractures of humerus.

Search