Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Articles

Operative Treatment of Traumatic Humeral Shaft Fracture: Comparision of Interlocking IM Nailing and Plate Fixation by Posterior Approach: Hyun Dae Shin, Kwang Jin Rhee, Kyung Cheon Kim, Ho Sup Song; J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18(2):93-99. Published online April 30, 2005; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2005.18.2.93

PURPOSE
To compare the results and complications of interlocking IM nailing and plate fixation by posterior approach in the treatment of traumatic humeral shaft fracture MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1997 to March 2003, 49 patients undergone operation due to traumatic humeral shaft fracture. Follow-up was over one year. 28 patients operated with interlocking IM nailing initially and 21 operated with plate fixation by posterior approach prospectively. Statistics were compared using clinical and radiological outcomes and complications.
RESULTS
Radiologically, bone union was observed after an average of 14.3 weeks in IM nailing, and 11.7 weeks in plate fixation. So plate fixation showed earlier bone union (p=0.012). Nonunion occurred in 4 cases (14.3%) operated with IM nailing, and 1 case (4.8%), that was open shaft fracture, with plate fixation. Nonunion occurred more frequently when operated by IM nailing. 6 cases showed limitation of shoulder movement due to damage of the rotator cuff by IM nail entry site. 1 case showed radial nerve palsy, and 1 case showed axillary nerve palsy in the case of IM nailing. Also, secondary surgery due to complications was operated in 9 cases (32.1%) in IM nailing and 1 case (4.8%) in plate fixation (p=0.03).
CONCLUSION
In the case of traumatic humeral shaft fracture plate fixation by posterior approach was more useful than IM nailing in the decrease of complications and bone union. Such approach is thought to be an excellent method for anatomic reduction and nerve exploration in the case of open and comminuted fracture which accompany nerve injuries

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical and Radiographical Follow-up for Residual Displacement of Fracture Fragments after Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing in Humeral Shaft Fractures
Jae-Kwang Yum, Dong-Ju Lim, Eui-Yub Jung, Su-Een Sohn
The Journal of the Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.2013; 16(2): 107. CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Anterior Plating of Humeral Shaft Fractures
Hyun-Joo Lee, Chang-Wug Oh, Do-Hyung Kim, Kyung-Hyun Park
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2011; 24(4): 341. CrossRef
Result of Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing for Humeral Shaft Fracture Evaluation of Post-operative Shoulder Function
Seung Rim Park, Tong Joo Lee, Ryuh Sub Kim, Kyoung Ho Moon, Dong Seok You
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(2): 166. CrossRef

112 View
0 Download
3 Crossref

Operative Treatment of Metacarpal Shaft Fracture>: Comparision of Low-Profile Miniplating System and Kirschner Wire Fixation: Hyun Dae Shin, Kwang Jin Rhee, Kyung Cheon Kim, Ho Sup Song; J Korean Fract Soc 2005;18(2):105-109. Published online April 30, 2005; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2005.18.2.105

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To compare Kirschner wire fixation and low profile miniplating system in metacarpal shaft fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients, available at least 1 year, who received the operative treatment after being diagnosed as metacarpal shaft fracture from 1997 May to 2003 May were the subjects with the exclusion of thumb fracture and intraarticular metacarpal bone fracture and also cases involving Kirschner wire fixation on severe laceration or open fracture. On the last follow up total action motion (TAM) and plain radiographes was checked.
RESULTS
In 7 cases (38.9%) where closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation were carried out, 8 cases (61.5%) where open reduction and Kirschner wire fixation were carried out and 24 cases (88.9%) where open reduction using miniplate and screw showed either excellent or good results on TAM. 5 cases of dorsal angulation occured in closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation group and 4 cases of dorsal angulation in open reduction and Kirschner wire fixation group however no cases of dorsal angulation occured in open reduction and miniplate and screw fixation group, and in all cases no rotational deformity, complications through ulnar or radial angulation occured. Internal fixation was carried out on 2 cases of nonunion which had closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation carried out, while the rest all showed bony union.
CONCLUSION
Selective use of low profile miniplate and screw fixation in the metacarpal shaft fracture is more effective than in cases of comminuted fracture which can not be achieved firm fixation by Kirschner wire fixation. Low profile miniplate and screw fixation can get more precise anatomical reduction and firm fixation so it allow early return to daily living activity and show low complication rate.

93 View
0 Download

Conservative Treatment of the Displaced Clavicular Shaft Fracture in Multiple Injury: Hyun Dae Shin, Kwang Jin Rhee, Young Mo Kim, Se Min Woo, Ho Sup Song; J Korean Fract Soc 2004;17(4):333-337. Published online October 31, 2004; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2004.17.4.333

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To analyse the comparative clinical results between adults with multiple injury including the clavicular shaft fracture and only clavicular shaft fracture who had supportive care through retrospective aspect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We had 48 adult patients in this hospital with simple fracture and multiple injury including the clavicular shaft whom we were able to evaluate at least more than a year. 12 of 48 patients were with only clavicular shaft fracture and the rest of them were with multiple injury. We classified patients into two groups those who had fracture with displacement for group A (A1 for the cases with over 50% of fracture surface contact rate and A2 for less than 50% from the images of simple X-ray) and those who had comminuted fracture for B. We compared the time of bone union, nonunion rate of only clavicular fractures and multiple injury, clinical results for patients who had supportive care with retrospective aspect.
RESULTS
A1 (7 cases), A2 (4 cases), B (1 case) were prevalent in the group of only clavicular shaft fracture and A1 (8 cases) and A2 (16 cases) and B (12 cases) were prevalent in the group of multiple injury. For the cases with supportive care, we could find 1 nonunion case (8%) and 11 union cases on average 2.91 months in the group of only clavicular shaft fracture and 7 nonunion cases (19%) and 29 union cases on average 3.58 months in the group of multiple injury. The best clinical results had occurred in 8 cases (67%) of only clavicular shaft fracture group and 19 cases (53%) of multiple injury group. We could find out the union from all 8 nonunion cases that took operation afterward.
CONCLUSION
Although the choice of treatment of clavicular fracture is supportive care, but multiple injury including the clavicular fracture is a high-energy injury, so the possibility of comminuted and displacement is high, so that nonunion rate is high. The possibility of early surgery must be considered seriously.

81 View
0 Download

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search