Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Original Articles

Differences of Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Threshold Between Lumbar Spine Fracture and Control group: Ig Gon Kim, Jae Hyek Kim, Jung Ill Kim, Young Ill Hong; J Korean Soc Fract 2001;14(2):257-264. Published online April 30, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.2.257

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to show how bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine decrease with aging, to investigate the relationship between the bone mineral densities of the control and fracture group, and to obtain fracture threshold values.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
From January 1995 to December 1999, we measured and evaluated BMD of L3 by DXA in 239 normal volunteers(96 men and 143 women), and in 218 patients with lumbar spine fracture(91 men and 127 women) above 50 years. The Chi-Square test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
1. The average BMD of L3 in control group and lumbar spine fracture group were 0.772+/-0.030 g/cm2 in male and 0.732+/-0 . 0 8 9 g / c m2 i n female and 0.720+/-0 . 0 3 1 g / c m2 in male and 0.692+/-0 . 0 0 2 g / c m2 i n female, respectively.
RESULTS
2. The BMD of the control group and fracture group decreased with aging(p<0.05) and were higher in men than in women. There were statistically significant difference(p<0.001).
RESULTS
3. There were statistically significant difference between BMD of the control group and BMD of the lumbar spine fracture group(p<0.05). The BMD were higher in the control group than fracture group.
RESULTS
4. Fracture threshold of the lumbar spine fracture group were 0.867g/cm2( male: 0.898g /cm2, female:0.836g/cm2) according to 90 percentile.

101 View
0 Download

Differences of Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Threshold Between Hip Joint Fracture and the Control group: Ig Gon Kim, Jae Hyek Kim, Cul Hyun Kim, Jong Suck Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 1999;12(2):231-238. Published online April 30, 1999; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1999.12.2.231

Abstract PDF: Osteoporosis represents reduced amount of bone mass per unit volume as compared with controls of the same age and sex. In this condition, bone mineral density decreases and the skeleton becomes more prone to fracture. The purpose of this study was to show how bone mineral densities of the femoral neck area decrease with aging, to in vestigate the relationship between the bone mineral densities of the control and fracture group, and to obtain fracture threshold values. This report observed BMD of femoral neck region in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture group was less than that of control group and the differences were significant. We measured and evaluated BMD of femoral neck region by DEXA in 234 normal volunteers(99 men and 135 women), in 105 patien ts with femoral neck fracture(41 men and 64 women) and in 103 patients with intertrochanteric fracture(40 men and 63 women) above 50 years-old. Following results were obtained: 1. The average BMD of femoral neck region in control group, femoral neck fracture group and intertrochanteric fracture group were 0.751+/-0.030 g/cm2 in male and 0.661+/-0.089g/cm2 in female, 0.660+/- 0.031g/cm2 in male and 0.557+/-0.002g/cm2 in female and 0.661+/-0.008g/cm2 in male and 0.562+/-0.005g/cm2 in 2. The BMD of the control group and fracture group decreased with aging and were higher in men than in women and there were statistically significant difference(p<0.001). 3. There were statistically significant difference between BMD of the control group and BMD of the hip fracture group(p<0.005) but no significant differences between BMD of the femoral neck fracture group and intertrochanteric fracture group. 4. Fracture threshold of the hip fracture group were 0.815g/cm2(male:0.832g/cm2, female:0.733g/cm2) according to 95 percentile.

104 View
0 Download

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search