PURPOSE For conservative treatment of shaft fractures, the butterfly fragments that were somewhat larger in the closed intra-medullary (IM) nailing. The results of treatment were monitored using radiography separately for the weight-bearing femur and non-weight-bearing humerus. MATERIALS AND METHODS 27 from Group I and 31 from Group II. In the two groups, the displacement and angulation changes in the fragments, and the degree of improvement of these two factors, were compared using follow-up radiography. RESULTS The mean angulation of fragments in Groups I and II were 9.2degrees and 9.6degrees, and the mean degree of displacement of the fragments in Groups I and II were 16.7 mm and 21.2 mm, respectively. Follow-up radiography showed that the above factors improved in both groups. The degree of displacement was significantly lower in the normal cases than in the complicated cases (p=0.001). CONCLUSION Displacement and angulation gradually improved in both groups. It was found that the degree of displacement after the initial reduction is more important than the influence of anatomical position or weight bearing. This indicates that care should be taken when inserting IM nails to prevent displacement or angulation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk Factors for Failure of Nonsurgical Management of Ulnar Shaft Fractures Carew C. Giberson-Chen, Cassandra M. Chruscielski, Dafang Zhang, Philip E. Blazar, Brandon Earp The Journal of Hand Surgery.2025; 50(4): 497.e1. CrossRef
The impact of the third fragment features on the healing of femoral shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing: a radiological study Giovanni Vicenti, Massimiliano Carrozzo, Vincenzo Caiaffa, Antonella Abate, Giuseppe Solarino, Davide Bizzoca, Roberto Maddalena, Giulia Colasuonno, Vittorio Nappi, Francesco Rifino, Biagio Moretti International Orthopaedics.2019; 43(1): 193. CrossRef
Reply to “Letter to the Editor on: The impact of the third fragment features on the healing of femoral shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing: a radiological study” Giovanni Vicenti, Massimiliano Carrozzo, Davide Bizzoca, Biagio Moretti International Orthopaedics.2019; 43(6): 1545. CrossRef
Letter to the Editor on “The impact of the third fragment features on the healing of femoral shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing: a radiological study” Shih-Jie Lin, Kevin Liaw, Tsan-Wen Huang International Orthopaedics.2019; 43(6): 1543. CrossRef
The impact of the third fragment features on the healing of femoral shaft fractures managed with intramedullary nailing: a radiological study Giovanni Vicenti, Massimiliano Carrozzo, Vincenzo Caiaffa, Antonella Abate, Giuseppe Solarino, Davide Bizzoca, Roberto Maddalena, Giulia Colasuonno, Vittorio Nappi, Francesco Rifino, Biagio Moretti International Orthopaedics.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of the Result of the Intramedullary Nail Fixation and Plate Fixation in Humeral Shaft Fracture with Butterfly Fragments Duk-Hwan Kho, Hyeung-June Kim, Byoung-Min Kim, Hyun-Ryong Hwang The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine.2016; 34(2): 120. CrossRef
Clinical and Radiographical Follow-up for Residual Displacement of Fracture Fragments after Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing in Humeral Shaft Fractures Jae-Kwang Yum, Dong-Ju Lim, Eui-Yub Jung, Su-Een Sohn The Journal of the Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society.2013; 16(2): 107. CrossRef
PURPOSE To evaluate the radiographic changes and union of large butterfly fragments after closed interlocking IM nailing for femoral shaft comminuted fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS The objects of this study were 23 cases(15 males, 8 females) of femoral shaft comminuted fractures with butterfly fragments larger than 5cm and with the follow up period of 12 months or more from June 1995 to June 2000. We assessed the size, the degrees of displacement and angulation of the large butterfly fragments at preoperatively, one day, one month and three month postoperatively and evaluated the union at four month and six month postoperatively. RESULTS The size of the fragments was 8.4cm (5.0-13.0) in average. The distance between the fragment and shaft was 15.9cm preoperatively and 10.1, 7.7, 6.8cm at one day, one month and three month postoperatively. In 13 cases of angulation over 5 degrees, it changed from 19.6 degrees preoperatively to 13.9 degrees , 8.4 degrees , 5 . 9 degrees at one day, one month and three month postoperatively. There is no increase in angulation.The union was completed at 4 months in 13 cases (56.5%) and at 6 months in all except one case of delayed union, in which we did not do any further procedure until the union was achieved. CONCLUSION In femoral shaft comminuted fractures with displaced large butterfly fragments treated with closed interlocking IM nailing, the distance and angulation of fragments decreased gradually and even the fragments were inverted or largely displaced and angulated the fragments were united. So the caution must be given not to displace the fragments intraoperatively and to keep anatomical position of the fragments by active exercise and hydrostatic pressure of the muscles of thigh postoperatively. Then the open reduction and internal fixations of the fragments will not be necessary.
PURPOSE : We evaluated the result of tibial fracture with butterfly fragment treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing and union of butterfly fragment.
Material and Method : The thirty tibial fractures with butterfly fragment treated with interlocking intramedullary nailing from 1994 February to 1997 January were followed up more than 12 months. They were clastified by Henleys classification based on the size of fragment and Johner and Wruhs classification cased on the comnlinution and accident mechanism. We evaluated the bone union of tibial fracture and butterfly fragment itself. RESULTS The time for bone union was Bl-14.5, B2-16.2, B3-18.8 weeks and Type I-15.2, Type II-17.1 Type III-18.3 weeks. In proximal and distal part of butterfly fragment, the time for bone union was 8.6 and 7.2 weeks in type I, 10.5 and 9.3 weeks in type II, and 11.8 and 10.2 weeks in type III. As the displacement of fragment were classified into 0-5, 5-10, and more than 10mm, the time for bone union was 15.3, 15.0 weeks in type I(no case in more than 10mm), 16.4, 17.5, 18.2 weeks in type II, and 17.7, 18.4, 20.3 weeks in type III. CONCLUSION : As the size and comminution of butterfly fragment increased, bony union was delayed. The union of spiral fracture in distal tibia was earlier than others, unrelated to the size of butterfly fragment. For the union of butterfly fragment, the distal part had earlier union than the proximal part. As the displacement of fragment was increased bone union was delayed.
Surgical Techniques for Percutaneous Reduction by Towel Clips and Percutaneous Intramedullary Fixation with Steinmann Pins for Clavicle Shaft Fractures Ki-Do Hong, Jae-Chun Sim, Sung-Sik Ha, Tae-Ho Kim, Jong-Hyun Kim, Jong-Seong Lee Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2012; 25(1): 31. CrossRef
Comparison of Results in Two Operative Treatments for Clavicle Shaft Fractures in Adult: Comparison of Results between Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with the Plate and Percutaneous Reduction by Towel Clip and Intramedullary Fixation with Steinmann Sung-Sik Ha, Jae-Chun Sim, Ki-Do Hong, Jae-Young Kim, Jung-Ho Kang, Kwang-Hee Park Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(3): 233. CrossRef