Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Review Articles

Current concepts and applications of bone graft substitutes in orthopedic surgery: Jae Ho Cho, Hyung Keun Song; J Musculoskelet Trauma 2025;38(4):169-177. Published online October 24, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jmt.2025.00248

Abstract PDF: Bone defects, which often arise from high-energy injuries, infections, tumor resections, or nonunions, represent a persistent challenge in orthopedic trauma surgery. Autologous bone grafting remains the gold standard due to its unique combination of osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties. However, issues such as donor site morbidity, limited graft volume, and increased surgical time have driven the development of bone graft substitutes. These substitutes vary widely in origin, composition, biological activity, and mechanical characteristics, encompassing allografts, xenografts, synthetic materials, and biologically enhanced constructs. This review outlines the fundamental biological principles underlying bone regeneration—including osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction—and addresses additional key factors such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and mechanical strength. Current bone graft materials are classified by biological origin and functional characteristics, with an emphasis on their use in trauma surgery. Particular attention is given to the clinical applications, indications, and limitations of allograft-based solutions (such as structural allografts and demineralized bone matrix), synthetic ceramics (including calcium phosphate and bioactive glass), and biologically enhanced options, such as recombinant growth factors and stem cell therapies. In trauma settings, graft selection must be tailored to the characteristics of the defect, mechanical demands, the biological environment, and patient-specific factors. Integration with surgical technique and fixation is crucial for optimizing outcomes. Although modern substitutes show promise, none fully replicate the complex biology of autografts. Looking ahead, emerging technologies such as 3D printing, nanotechnology, and smart biomaterials offer exciting possibilities but face translational challenges. This review aims to provide practicing orthopedic surgeons with a concise, evidence-based overview of bone substitute options and their roles in trauma care. By applying core biological principles and clinical judgment, surgeons can better navigate the expanding array of graft materials to improve outcomes for patients with complex skeletal defects.

348 View
7 Download

Bone Substitutes and the Advancement for Enhancing Bone Healing: Dong Hyun Lee, Ji Wan Kim; J Korean Fract Soc 2017;30(2):102-109. Published online April 30, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2017.30.2.102

With an aging population and the development of surgical techniques, there is a growing demand for bone reconstruction in areas of trauma, arthroplasty, and spinal fusion Although autogenous bone grafting may be the best method for stimulating bone repair and regeneration, there are still problems and complications, including morbidity related to bone harvesting and limitation of harvest amount. Allogeneic bone grafts have a limited supply and risk of transmission of infectious diseases. Over the past several decades, the use of bone substitutes, such as calcium phosphate, has increased; however, they have limited indications. Biomedical research has suggested a possibility of stimulating the self-healing mechanism by locally transmitting the external growth factors or stimulating local production through a gene transfer. In this review, we evaluate recent advances, including bone graft, bone substitutes, and tissue engineering.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Calcium phosphate injection technique for treatment of distal radius fracture
Dae-Geun Kim, Byung Hoon Kwack
Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols.2021; 2(9): e0117. CrossRef
Experimental Study ofDohongsamul-tang(Taohongsiwu-tang) on Fracture Healing
Hyun Ju Ha, Min-Seok Oh
Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation.2020; 30(2): 47. CrossRef

384 View
0 Download
2 Crossref

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search