-
Crush Syndrome: Traumatic Rhabdomyolysis, Reperfusion Injury
-
Yong-Cheol Yoon
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2023;36(2):62-68. Published online April 30, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2023.36.2.62
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF
- A crush injury causes damage to bones, muscles, blood vessels, nerves, and other tissues caused due to pressure. Crush syndrome is a reperfusion injury that occurs throughout the body after a crush injury and leads to traumatic rhabdomyolysis, in which muscle fibers are broken down. Owing to the decreased blood supply, inflammation, and changes in metabolic activity, fluids and electrolytes in the blood can move into tissues, causing hypovolemic shock. In addition, toxic substances resulting from cell destruction can circulate through the bloodstream, causing electrolyte imbalances, renal failure, arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, with approximately 15% of patients with acute renal failure dying. The treatment for crush syndrome involves aggressive fluid therapy and correction of the electrolyte imbalances, while patients with acute renal failure may require dialysis. Surgical treatment may include debridement and irrigation of necrotic tissue, and fasciotomy is necessary to address compartment syndrome, a complication that may arise.
-
Comparison of a Novel Box-Frame External Fixator and Conventional Delta-Frame External Fixator in the Staged Treatment of Distal Tibia Fractures
-
Yong-Cheol Yoon, MinKyu Shin, Chang-Wug Oh, Jong-Keon Oh
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2020;33(3):125-133. Published online July 31, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2020.33.3.125
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Distal tibia fractures with severe soft-tissue edema or intra-articular fractures are treated by staged operations using external fixators. Definitive surgery that maintains ligamentotaxis has been difficult using existing fixators. This study introduced a novel ‘box-frame’ external fixator and evaluated its clinical usefulness.
Materials and Methods
This study included 45 patients (32 males, 13 females) diagnosed with distal tibia fractures who underwent staged operations between March 2012 and March 2016, with a follow-up of at least one year. The patients were divided into two groups. In one group, fixation was performed with a box-frame external fixator (Group A). In the other group, fixation was performed with a delta-frame external fixator (Group B). The following outcomes were evaluated: the time until definitive surgery, operative time of the definitive surgery, radiation exposure time, bone union, time to achieve bone union, postsurgical complications, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society anklehindfoot score, and ankle range of motion.
Results
Compared to the delta-frame, the box-frame showed a statistically significant reduction in the mean radiation-exposure time and operative time during the definitive surgery by 58 seconds and 25 minutes, respectively. The differences in the time until definitive surgery, bone union, time to achieve bone union, postsurgical complications, and functional scores were not significant.
Conclusion
The box-frame external fixator can be a useful treatment method in the staged surgery of distal tibia fractures.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Temporary Circular External Fixation for Spanning the Traumatized Ankle Joint
Nando Ferreira, Niel Bruwer, Adriaan Jansen van Rensburg, Ernest Muserere, Shao-Ting Jerry Tsang
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Temporary circular external fixation for spanning the traumatised ankle joint: A cohort comparison study
William D. Harrison, Franklin Fortuin, Matthieu Durand-Hill, Etienne Joubert, Nando Ferreira
Injury.2022; 53(10): 3525. CrossRef
-
224
View
-
3
Download
-
2
Crossref
|
E-submission
KFS
