Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Sogu Lew

6 Articles

Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture with Proximal Femoral Nail: Bum Soo Kim, Sogu Lew, Sang Hun Ko, Sung Do Cho, Jeung Hun Yang, Moon Su Park; J Korean Fract Soc 2004;17(1):1-6. Published online January 31, 2004; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2004.17.1.1

PURPOSE
To evaluate the usefulness of proximal femoral nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors investigated the classificaton of fracture, operation time, the amount of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, the amount of transfusion, postoperative ambulation status, bone union time and the complication among 45 cases who were treated with proximal femoral nail from Jan. 2001 to June 2002.
RESULTS
The mean operation time was 116 minutes, and the amount of bleeding was 524 ml in average. The amount of intraoperative transfusion was 1.4 pints and that of postoperative transfusion was 1.1 pints. The complications were the intraoperative penetration of antirotational screw through the femoral neck in 2 cases, separation of the fracture fragment while inserting the nail in 4 cases, irritation of skin by retropulsion of antirotation screw in 2 cases, and penetration of antirotation screw through femoral head in 1 case.
CONCLUSION
Proximal femoral nail was effective for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture, however the surgeon should be carful about collision of the insertion handle against pelvis when the fracture line coincides with the insertion point of nail, especially in obese patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures in Elderly Patients over 80 Years Old - Comparative Analysis between Femoral Neck Fracture and Intertrochanteric Fracture -
Chae-Hyun Lim, Young-Yool Chung, Jeong-Seok Kim, Chung-Young Kim
Hip & Pelvis.2013; 25(1): 44. CrossRef
Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures Using Targon Proximal Femoral Nails
Il Ho Park, Jong Kyoung Won, Kye Young Han
Hip & Pelvis.2012; 24(2): 117. CrossRef
Results of the Proximal Femoral Nail-Antirotation (PFNA) in Patients with an Unstable Pertrochanteric Fracture
Yerl-Bo Sung, Sung-Il Jo
The Journal of the Korean Hip Society.2011; 23(1): 39. CrossRef
Comparison of the Compression Hip Screw (CHS) and the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture
Jong Min Lim, Jeung Il Kim, Jong Seok Oh, Kuen Tak Suh, Jae Min Ahn, Dong Joon Kang
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(4): 360. CrossRef
Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail A
Jung Ho Park, Jong Woong Park, Joon Ho Wang, Jae Wook Lee, Jung Il Lee, Jae Gyoon Kim
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2008; 21(2): 103. CrossRef
Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture with Proximal Femoral Nail
Dae Joong Kim, Sung Chan Ki, Young Yool Chung
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(1): 40. CrossRef
Complications of Femoral Pertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN)
Kee-Byoung Lee, Byung-Taek Lee
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2007; 20(1): 33. CrossRef

97 View
1 Download
7 Crossref

The Treatment Of Humeral Shaft Fracture With Rertograde Ao Unreamed Humeral Nail: Tae Woo Park, Sung Do Cho, Young Sun Cho, Bum Soo Kim, Sogu Lew, Moon Chan Kim, Ki Young Kim; J Korean Soc Fract 2002;15(3):398-403. Published online July 31, 2002; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2002.15.3.398

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To evaluate the results of the treatment of humeral shaft fractures using retrograde AO Unreamed Humeral Nail(UHN).
MATERIALS AND METHOD
From Apr. 1998 and Aug. 2001, 18 humeral shaft fractures were treated with retrograde AO UHN. All fractures were classified according to the AO classification. The results were analyzed by bony union time, range of motion and complication.
RESULTS
There were eleven cases of A3, two B2, one B3, four A2 humeral middle shaft fractures according to the AO classification. The mean bony union time was 12.2 weeks(range;9-16 weeks). All patients regained full range of motion of the shoulder joint and the elbow joint but 2 patients with intraopenatively ruptured capsule had transient elbow motion limitation. Complications were iatrogenic fractures at the entry portal in 2 patients(15%), transient shoulder pain in 4 patients(30.7%), nonunion in 1 patient(7.6%), required bone graft and internal fixation after removal of the nail at 13 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
The treatment of humeral shaft fracture with retrograde AO unreamed humeral nail is one of the good options to reduce the rate of non-union or delayed union by compression effect if the intraoperative errors is prevented.

109 View
0 Download

Comparison of Surgical Treatment for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Tae Woo Park, Sung Do Cho, Yong Sun Cho, Bum Soo Kim, Sogu Lew, Jong Ken Woo; J Korean Soc Fract 2002;15(1):59-64. Published online January 31, 2002; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2002.15.1.59

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To evaluate the result of modified Bosworth method augmented with Mersilene tape(MBM) compared with modified Bosworth method(MB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty two acromiclavicular dislocation wrer treated with MB(15cares) or MBM(17 cases) and the mean follow up period was 26 months(12-43 months). We assessed the radiological and clinical evaluation(X-Ray & Weitzman Criteria) and complications.
RESULTS
Twenty nine cases(91%)(MB 13, MBM 16) were "excellent" or "good" according to the Weitzman criteria. At last follow-up, mean difference of the coracocalvialar distance between the normal and the injured site were 1.9mm(MB) and 1.6mm(MBM) and two ceses were developed the arthritis, and then performed the distal clavicle resection.
CONCLUSION
Modified Bosworth method augmented with Mersilene tape is a good option for acromioclavicular dislocation in stabilizing the joint, even if the screw loosening occurs with early postoperative ROM.

42 View
0 Download

Isolated trochlear fracture of the distal humerus: A case report: Sogu Lew, Joon O Yoon, Soo Sung Park, Eugene Kim, Seung Jun Shin; J Korean Soc Fract 2001;14(2):253-256. Published online April 30, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.2.253

Abstract PDF

The trochlear fracture of the distal humerus known as a Laugier fracture is extremely rare in occurrence because this articulating unit has no capsule, muscle, or ligamentous attachment and is cradled by the olecranon. Isolated, displaced fracture of the trochlea presented with review of the literature

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Fractures of the humeral trochlea: case presentations and review
Lucas B.J. Gonçalves, David C. Ring
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.2016; 25(6): e151. CrossRef

120 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL TIBIA FRACTURE WITH HYBRID EXTERNAL FIXATOR: Tae Woo Park, Sung Do Cho, Youg Sun Cho, Bum Soo Kim, Sogu Lew, Su Yeon Hwang; J Korean Soc Fract 2001;14(2):285-290. Published online April 30, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.2.285

Abstract PDF

PURPOSE
To evaluate the results and usefulness of hybrid external fixator in the treatment of proximal tibia fracture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From Jan. 1997 to Jan. 2000, 19 proximal tibia fracture were treated with hybrid external fixator with or without limited internal fixation to stabilize the articular surface. All fractures were classified according to the AO classification. The results were analyzed by ROM(range of motion), bony union time, fracture reduction with MPTA(medial proximal tibial angle) and joint congruency.
RESULT
There were 1 A2, 7 A3, 1 C1, 8 C2, 2 C3 proximal tibial fractures according to the AO classification. Open fractures were 10 patients. The mean bony union time was 13 wks(range 8-36wks) and the mean length of time in the external fixator was 14wks(range 8-36wks). At last follow up, the MPTA of the proximal tibia was 87.9 degree. 2 patients developed varus(82 degree) and valgus(92 degree) deformity respectively. Complications were intermittent pin drainage in 6 patients(31.6%), deep infection in 1 patient(5.3%) and nonunion in 4 patients(21%) required bone graft and internal fixation with plate at 6 months postoperatively. Four nonunions were 3 C2 and 1 C3 according to the AO classification and three were open fracture(1 type I, 1 type IIIb, 1 type IIIc : Gustilo type) CONCLUSION: Hybrid external fixation is a good treatment option for proximal tibial fractures. However, nonunion and angular deformity would occur in severe metaphyseal comminution and soft tissue injury. Accurate fracture reduction and careful soft tissue management is prerequisite and if necessory early bone graft should be considered in such cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Staged Management of High Energy Proximal Tibia Fractures with Severe Soft Tissue Damage
Seung-Ryul Lee, Jae-Hoon Yang, June-Kyu Lee, Hyun-Dae Shin, Kyung-Cheon Kim, Kyu-Woong Yeon, Young-Mo Kim
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2009; 22(3): 152. CrossRef

78 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

Comparison of the results between reamed and unreamed femoral nailing: Bum Soo Kim, Sung Do Cho, Yong Sun Cho, Tae Woo Park, Sogu Lew, Hyung Jin Cho, Soo Hyun Cho; J Korean Soc Fract 2001;14(2):208-213. Published online April 30, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.2.208

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
To evaluate the effectiveness between reamed and unreamed nailing in the treatment of femoral shaft fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Among the patients of femoral shaft fracture who were treated with reamed and unreamed nail, we reviewed 49 patients whose follow-up was possible for more than 1 year. The patients were divided into two groups: the reamed and the unreamed group. We reviewed union time, nonunion rate, complication and operation time and compared the effectiveness.
RESULTS
The average union time was 30.6 weeks in unreamed group and 27.8 weeks in reamed group, which was not different statistically. There were 5 cases of nonunion in 22 unreamed cases and 3 cases in 27 reamed cases, which meant no statistical difference. There was no significant difference of complications between the two groups. The mean operation time was 141 minutes in reamed group and 110 minutes in unreamed group, which meant statistical difference.
CONCLUSION
There was no significant difference in union time, nonunion rate and comlication between reamed and unremed group. The operation time was shorter in unreamed group, so unreamed nailing can be preferred in the treatment of multiply injured patient.

50 View
0 Download

Author index