-
Comparison of the Treatment Results between Reduction with Percutaneous Wiring and Reduction without Percutaneous Wiring in Reverse Oblique Trochanteric Fractures (AO Classification 31-A3.3)
-
Jae Woo Park, Oog Jin Shon, Seung Wan Lim
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2017;30(4):192-197. Published online October 31, 2017
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2017.30.4.192
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of percutaneous wiring in the reduction of reverse oblique trochanteric fractures (AO classification 31-A3.3) by analyzing the treatment results with or without the use of percutaneous wiring. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-five cases from January 2008 to August 2014 that could be followed-up for at least one year were selected among patients with unstable trochanteric fractures who underwent either internal fixation or open reduction. Seventeen patients underwent surgery with percutaneous wire fixation but another 18 patients underwent surgery without it. All patients received a closed reduction and internal fixation with an intramedullary nail. The factors evaluated were as follows: the length of operation, loss of blood, length of in-hospital stay, lower limb function scale, return to preinjury daily life, change in femur neck shaft angle, postoperative gap of the fracture site, time taken for bone attachment, quality of post-operative reduction, and complications. RESULTS No significant difference in the mean operative time, loss of blood, length of in hospital stay, lower limb function scale, return to pre-injury daily life, change in femur neck shaft angle, postoperative gap of the fracture site, and quality of postoperative reduction was observed between the two groups. A significant difference was noted in the time taken for bone attachment (p=0.032). Bone attachment took 13.3 weeks (9–17 weeks) on average when fixed with percutaneous wiring and no patient was found to have any complications. When treated without percutaneous wiring, however, bone attachment took 17.8 weeks (12.5–28.0 weeks) on average and three cases resulted in delayed union. CONCLUSION Percutaneous wiring is a recommended treatment option for patients with an unstable trochanteric fracture.
-
Steinmann Pin Assisted Reduction of Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture
-
Seung Wan Lim, Oog Jin Shon
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2015;28(1):17-22. Published online January 31, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2015.28.1.17
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- PURPOSE
Nail insertion is the treatment of choice for subtrochanteric femoral fracture, but displacement of proximal bone fragment makes it difficult to find an ideal entry point. Therefore, in this study we aimed to determine the usefulness of treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fracture using Steinmann pin assisted reduction, internal fixation, and insertion of intramedullary nails. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated 33 patients who were followed-up more than a year with a displaced subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation between January 2008 and March 2013. In addition, we studied postoperative bone union time, postoperative reduction status, change of the femur neck shaft angle, evaluation of hip joint function, return to daily life, and complications. RESULTS All fractures with Steinmann pin assisted reduction were united but they included three cases of delayed union. In Fogagnolo classification, all cases were up to acceptable states and the varus change of femur neck shaft angle was 0.94degrees+/-3.1degrees; no significant difference in Harris hip score was observed between preoperative and last follow-up (p>0.05). CONCLUSION There were satisfactory results in bone union and reduction state with Steinmann pin assisted reduction. Therefore, Steinmann pin assisted reduction is a useful surgical technique for subtrochanteric femoral fracture.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
- Percutaneous acetabular anchoring pin-assisted cephalomedullary nailing for subtrochanteric and unstable intertrochanteric fractures
Keong-Hwan Kim, Youngsik Yoon, Eic Ju Lim Injury.2020; 51(3): 769. CrossRef
-
149
View
-
4
Download
-
1
Crossref
|