-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes for Lisfranc Joint Injuries: Dorsal Bridge Plating versus Transarticular Screw versus Combination
-
Ba Rom Kim, Jun Young Lee, Sung Hun Yang, Seung Hyun Lee
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2023;36(1):17-24. Published online January 31, 2023
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2023.36.1.17
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF
- Purpose
In Lisfranc joint injury, the traditional treatment has been open reduction and internal fixation with a transarticular screw. Despite this, additional complications, such as damage to the articular surface and breakage of the screw, have been reported. Therefore, this study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of dorsal bridge plating with those of transarticular screws and combination treatment in Lisfranc joint injury.
Materials and Methods
Among the 43 patients who underwent surgical treatment due to Lisfranc joint injury from June 2015 to March 2021, 40 cases followed for more than six months after surgery were analyzed, excluding three patients: one lost to follow-up, one had to amputate, and one expired. The radiological parameters were measured using the Wilppula classification in the last follow-up. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score.
Results
The AOFAS midfoot score, according to the surgical method, was significantly higher in the dorsal bridge plating (p=0.003). The radiological outcomes showed significantly better anatomical reduction when dorsal bridge plating was used (p=0.040). According to the Wilppula classification, the AOFAS midfoot score improved as the quality of anatomical reduction improved (p=0.018). Finally, the AOFAS midfoot score decreased as the number of column fixations increased (p=0.002). There were two complications: screw breakage in dorsal bridge plating and superficial skin necrosis in the combination treatment. Skin defects caused by necrosis improved after negative pressure wound therapy and split-thickness skin graft.
Conclusion
In treating Lisfranc joint injuries, open reduction and internal fixation by dorsal bridge plating can be an appropriate treatment option. Nevertheless, studies, such as long-term follow-up research, on complications, such as osteoarthritis, will be needed.
-
Analysis of Clinical and Functional Outcomes according to the Blood Sugar Control Status at the Time of Ankle Fractures Resulting from Rotational Injuries
-
Jun Young Lee, Dong Seop Lim, Seung Hyun Lee, Seo Jin Park
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2022;35(4):135-141. Published online October 31, 2022
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2022.35.4.135
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Patients with diabetes are known to have poor clinical outcomes due to the high incidence of complications after ankle joint fracture surgery. This study reports the clinical and functional outcomes based on glycemic control status among patients with ankle joint fractures who underwent surgical treatment.
Materials and Methods
Among patients who underwent surgical treatment due to ankle joint fractures from January 2015 to October 2019, 253 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were identified. We divided them into 3 groups: 195 patients with no diabetes (Group A), 26 patients with well-controlled diabetes (Group B), and 32 patients with uncontrolled diabetes (Group C). In addition, patients with lateral, medial malleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar fractures were identified using radi-ography. The functional outcome measures used for evaluation were the Revised Foot Function Index (FFI), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).
Results
Bone union at 3 months after surgery was high in Group A, showing significant differences compared to the other groups. There was a significant difference between the groups in the incidence of arthropathy and one or more complications. However, the FFI, SMFA, and FAOS did not show significant differences between the groups.
Conclusion
The incidence of complications was high in patients with uncontrolled diabetes compared to the patients with well-controlled diabetes and those with no diabetes. However, functional outcomes showed no significant difference.
|
E-submission
KFS
