-
The Operative Treatment of Radial Head or Neck Fracture: The Sub-classification of Mason Type II Fracture
-
Hyun Dae Shin, Kyung Cheon Kim, Se Min Woo, Yong Bum Joo, Dong Kyu Kim
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2006;19(4):449-453. Published online October 31, 2006
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2006.19.4.449
-
-
 Abstract
- PURPOSE
To evaluate the results of treatment according to the sub-classification of the Mason type II fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From 1999 to 2003, according to the sub-classification of the Mason type II fracture, 33 patients were treated with miniplate in displaced neck fracture (IIa), with compression screw in displaced head fracture (IIb), with miniplate and/or compression screw in displaced head and neck fracture (IIc), with compression screw and miniplate in comminution fracture (III) or excision of head in irreducible state. The clinical results were evaluated by An and Morrey's functional rating index.
RESULTS
Functional rate score averaged 92.7 in type IIa, 88.4 in IIb, 86.4 in IIc, 83.5 in type III with reduced fracture, 75.0 in type III with excised head, and 75.5 in type IV. Complications included heterotopic ossification (2 cases), metal loosening (1 case), malunion (1 case), partial ankylosis of elbow (3 cases), posttraumatic arthritis (1 case).
CONCLUSION
These results supported the recommendation for internal fixation with compression screw in isolated radial head fracture (IIb) and with miniplate in fracuture combined with displaced neck (IIa, IIc, indicated some III). We concluded that sub-classification is useful for dicision making in radial head or neck fracture's treatment.
-
Conservative Treatment of the Displaced Clavicular Shaft Fracture in Multiple Injury
-
Hyun Dae Shin, Kwang Jin Rhee, Young Mo Kim, Se Min Woo, Ho Sup Song
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2004;17(4):333-337. Published online October 31, 2004
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2004.17.4.333
-
-
Abstract
 PDF
- PURPOSE
To analyse the comparative clinical results between adults with multiple injury including the clavicular shaft fracture and only clavicular shaft fracture who had supportive care through retrospective aspect.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We had 48 adult patients in this hospital with simple fracture and multiple injury including the clavicular shaft whom we were able to evaluate at least more than a year. 12 of 48 patients were with only clavicular shaft fracture and the rest of them were with multiple injury. We classified patients into two groups those who had fracture with displacement for group A (A1 for the cases with over 50% of fracture surface contact rate and A2 for less than 50% from the images of simple X-ray) and those who had comminuted fracture for B. We compared the time of bone union, nonunion rate of only clavicular fractures and multiple injury, clinical results for patients who had supportive care with retrospective aspect.
RESULTS
A1 (7 cases), A2 (4 cases), B (1 case) were prevalent in the group of only clavicular shaft fracture and A1 (8 cases) and A2 (16 cases) and B (12 cases) were prevalent in the group of multiple injury. For the cases with supportive care, we could find 1 nonunion case (8%) and 11 union cases on average 2.91 months in the group of only clavicular shaft fracture and 7 nonunion cases (19%) and 29 union cases on average 3.58 months in the group of multiple injury. The best clinical results had occurred in 8 cases (67%) of only clavicular shaft fracture group and 19 cases (53%) of multiple injury group. We could find out the union from all 8 nonunion cases that took operation afterward.
CONCLUSION
Although the choice of treatment of clavicular fracture is supportive care, but multiple injury including the clavicular fracture is a high-energy injury, so the possibility of comminuted and displacement is high, so that nonunion rate is high. The possibility of early surgery must be considered seriously.
|
E-submission
KFS
