Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Ki Ho Sung

3 Articles

Retrograde Nailing in Femur Supracondylar Fracture: Jin Woo Kwon, Sung Ho Shin, Won Ho Cho, Ki Ho Sung, Ki Han Kim, Kyong Tae Sohn, Sang Hoon Lee, Se Won Park, Jong Moon Bae, Tae Woo Kwon; J Korean Soc Fract 2003;16(4):465-473. Published online October 31, 2003; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2003.16.4.465

PURPOSE
We retrospectively analysed the result of retrograde supracondylar nail fixation in femur supracondylar fractures and evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this method.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Since October 1998 we have treated 14 supracondylar fractures (AO type: A2-6, A3-1, C1-3 and C2-4) by retrograde intramedullary nailing technique through trans-patellar tendon approach from October 1998 to June 2001 and followed more than 1 year.
RESULTS
Among 14 cases, 5 cases were excellent, 6 good, 3 fair according to Schatzker functional result. The complications were 1 distal locking screw loosening, 1 delayed union and 1 fracture around proximal locking site.
CONCLUSION
Even though the retrograde nailing may damage the knee joint because it is inserted by opening up the joint, it provided the necessary stable fixation with short operation time, low blood loss, minimal soft tissue injury. Thus we believe that retrograde nailing is useful operative technique for the management of supracondylar fracture in osteoporotic, communited fractures, or open fractures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Retrograde Nailing for Supracondylar Fracture after Total Knee Replacement: The Compatibility of Femoral Implant with Supracondylar Nail
Moon-Jib Yoo, You-Jin Kim, Jin-Won Lee
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2008; 21(1): 19. CrossRef

124 View
0 Download
1 Crossref

The Effect of Dynamization in Tibia Fracture: Jin Woo Kwon, Seung Ho Shin, Won Ho Cho, Woo Se Lee, Ki Ho Sung; J Korean Soc Fract 2001;14(1):52-59. Published online January 31, 2001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2001.14.1.52

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of dynamization which was done for the treatment of delayed union or persisting fracture gap after interlocking intramedullary nailing, by radiographic and physical examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed 22 cases these were treated with dynamization from 247 cases of tibia shaft fracture treated initially with static interlocking intramedullary nailing from February l990 to May 2000 and were followed up more than lyear. The result of dynamization was classified as 3 groups and we divided each results 3 categories that is effective result, uncertain result and ineffective result. Group A is cases that achived ultimate union with shortening of fracture gap and was 10 cases. Group B is that achieved ultimate union but fracture gap did not reduced and was 10 cases. Group C is that showed ultimate non-union and was 2 cases.
RESULTS
The result is that dynamization was effective only 4 cases of group A. 6 cases of group A and 4 cases of group B showed instability(radiolucent halo around nail, hypertrophied callus and leg pain), and 6 cases of group B showed no shortening of fracture gap, thus these were classified as uncertain result. Group C(2 cases) showed non-union, classified as ineffective.
CONCLUSION
Dynamization caused instability in most tibia fractures except simple mid-shaft fracture. So in the comminuted fractures and distal or proximal l/3 oblique fractures, other procedures such as bone graft, refixation should be considered rather than dynamization.

52 View
0 Download

Throwing Fractures of the Humerus: 2 Cases Report: Jin Woo Kwon, Seung Ho Shin, Won Ho Cho, Woo Se Lee, Ki Ho Sung; J Korean Soc Fract 2000;13(4):978-981. Published online October 31, 2000; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2000.13.4.978

Abstract PDF: Spiral fractures of the middle or distal shaft of the humerus that occur during attempts to throw a variety of objects are not common. Many authors have reported that the cause of fracture was the results of uncoordinated muscle violence. We experienced two cases of throwing fractures of humerus, one is baseball player(catcher) preceded by arm pain during throwing motion, the other is recreational hand grenade player without prodromal arm pain.

104 View
1 Download

Author index