-
Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail A
-
Jung Ho Park, Jong Woong Park, Joon Ho Wang, Jae Wook Lee, Jung Il Lee, Jae Gyoon Kim
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2008;21(2):103-109. Published online April 30, 2008
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2008.21.2.103
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF
- PURPOSE
To evaluate the results of fracture fixation between using Proximal Femoral Nail and using Proximal Femoral Nail A and to analyze the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail A.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed 32 patients who suffered from intertrochanteric fracture in our hospital, which were 19 cases of PFN and 13 cases of PFNA. Retrospectively we evaluated mean operation time, amount of bleeding, beginning of ambulation, average union period, changes of neck shaft angle and complication on set of telephone interview and OPD. We also evaluated postoperative capability of function and mobility using 'Social function score' and 'Mobility score'.
RESULTS
PFNA showed shorter mean operation time, less bleeding, shorter average union period, earlier ambulation and less change of neck shaft angle than PFN. Although they didn't show statistical difference, postoperative capability of function and mobility showed statistical and mathematical difference on each group.
CONCLUSION
PFNA showed better results of postoperative function and mobility and less complications than PFN. So treatment using PFNA is better method than that of PFN.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Treatment of the Proximal Femoral Fracture Using the New Design Cephalomedullary Nail: Prospective Outcomes Study
Young Ho Roh, Joseph Rho, Kwang Woo Nam
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2019; 32(1): 35. CrossRef - Comparative Study of Intertrochanteric Fracture Treated with the Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation and the Third Generation of Gamma Nail
Jae-Cheon Sim, Tae-Ho Kim, Ki-Do Hong, Sung-Sik Ha, Jong-Seong Lee
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(1): 37. CrossRef - Comparative Study of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Zimmer Natural Nail for the Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures
Jee-Hoon Kim, Oog-Jin Shon
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2013; 26(4): 305. CrossRef - Helical Blade versus Lag Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture
Kwang-Jun Oh, Sung-Tae Lee, Suk-Ha Lee, Jin-Ho Hwang, Min-Suk Kang
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(1): 6. CrossRef - Treatment of the Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: Comparison with Compression Hip Screw with Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate
Tae-Ho Kim, Jong-Oh Kim, Seung-Yup Lee, Geon-Ung Yun
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(4): 353. CrossRef - Comparison of the Compression Hip Screw (CHS) and the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture
Jong Min Lim, Jeung Il Kim, Jong Seok Oh, Kuen Tak Suh, Jae Min Ahn, Dong Joon Kang
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society.2010; 23(4): 360. CrossRef
-
135
View
-
0
Download
-
6
Crossref
-
Comparative Study of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Second Generation Intramedullary Nailing on Treatment of Elderly Unstable Peritrochanteric Femoral Fractures
-
Ho Hyun Yun, Gil Yeong Ahn, Il Hyun Nam, Gi Hyuk Moon, Jae Wook Lee, Jae Cheol Kim
-
J Korean Fract Soc 2006;19(2):128-134. Published online April 30, 2006
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2006.19.2.128
-
-
Abstract
- PURPOSE
To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcome of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and second generation intramedullary nailing for elderly unstable peritrochanteric femoral fracutre.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 2000 to July 2004, 56 elderly unstable peritrochanteric fractures were treated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty (34 cases) or a ITST intramedullary nailing (22 cases). The fractures were classified using the OTA/AO classification. The clinical results were evaluated by walking capability, hip joint pain, and thigh pain. The radiological results were evaluated on the basis of the radiographs at follow-up.
RESULTS
In bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, The mean operation time was 134 minute, the mean blood loss was 648 ml. In intramedullary nailing group, The mean operation time was 103 minute, the mean blood loss was 386 ml. There were no different walking ability between prefracture and postoperative state in 22 cases (65%) of bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, 18 cases (80%) of intramedullary nailing group respectively. There were 5 cases (14%) hip joint pain in bipolar hemiarthroplasty group and 4 cases (18%) thigh pain in ITST intramedullary nailing group postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
Comparing the operation time, blood loss, and walking ability, ITST intramedullary nailing group show superior clinical outcomes than bipolar hemiarthroplasty group. However, The effort for decreasing postoperative thigh pain might be required.
|
E-submission
KFS
