-
Treatment of the Clavicle Fracture
-
Kwang Suk Lee, Jung Ho Park, Geol Choi
-
J Korean Soc Fract 1995;8(3):461-466. Published online July 31, 1995
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1995.8.3.461
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF
- The clavicular fractures occur frequently and are treated conservatively, usually. But things are trending toward operative treatment in displaced cases due to nonunion.
From June 1984 to November 1993, 153 patients(156 cases) among 297 patients with the clavicular fractures were analysed at Department of orthopedic surgery, Korea university hospital.
The brief summary of the observations are as follows: 1. among 156 cases, the right side were 72 cases, the left side were 84 cases and both were 3 patients. The most common cause of injury was the the traffic accident and the most frequent site of the fracture was middle one-third.
2. According to the Allmans classification, the fractures were classified in three groups. Group Iwere 113 cases, Group II were 28 cases and Croup III were 15 cases and the average age of each groups were individually 28.7 yeara,35.4 years and 41.4 years respectively.
3. The average duration of the radiological union of the conservative treatment were 9.8 weeks in Group I ,9.7 weeks in Group II and 10.3 weeks in Group III. And of the operative treatment were 10.1 weeks in Group I , 10.1 weeks in Group II and 9.9 weeks in Group III Any difference between the conservative and the operative treatment was not observed.
4. The complications were nonunion in 2 cases, delayed union in 2 cases and refracture in 1 case after conservative treatment, and nonunion in 2 cases, delayed union in 1 case, refracture in 1 case and superficial wound infection in 1 case after operative treatment.
-
The Operative Treatment of the Shaft Fractures of the Forearm Bone
-
Sang Won Park, Geol Choi
-
J Korean Soc Fract 1995;8(1):199-205. Published online January 31, 1995
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1995.8.1.199
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- The reduction and maintenance of the disphyseal fractures of the forearm bone are difficult due to the special rotational movement between two bones. Over the years various methods of operative treatment have been advocated, and good method must be selected as the fracture level, the fracture type, and the patients general condition.
From May 1988 to August 1993, the authors have reviewed 50 patients of the forearm shaft fracture except the solitary radius or ulna fracture with minimum 1 year follow up which were treated in Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Hospital.
The results obtained were as follows, 1. The most common cause of injury was the traffic accident(38%) and the next was the fall down(24%). The most frequent level of the fracture was middle one-third(54%) and the most common type of the fracture was transverse fracture(64%). The treatment methods were 32 cases of the compression plate and screw fuation in the radius and ulna, and 18 cases of the compression plate and screw fixation in radius and the intramedullary nailing in ulna.
2. The average duration of the radiological union of compression plate and screw fixation of radius and ulna was 12.5 weeks in radius and 12.1 weeks in ulna, and 12.8 weeks of radius and 15.2 weeks of ulna in cases of compression plate and screw fixation of radius and intramedullary nailing of ulna.
3. According to Grace and Eversmanns evaluation, satisfactory results (Excellent and Good) were 81.5% of compression plate and screw fixation and 83.3.To of compression plate and screw fixation of radius and intramedullary nailing of ulna.
4. Postoperative complication were 2 cases of superFicial wound infection and each 1 case of transient posterior interosseous nerve injury, non-union and non-union with metal failure in compression plate and screw fixation of both radius and ulna, and 1 case of non-union in intramedullary nailing of the ulna.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Comparison of Locking versus Dynamic Compression Plates for Treatment of Diaphyseal Forearm Fracture
Yong Chan Lee, Hong Je Kang
Journal of the Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand.2015; 20(4): 168. CrossRef
-
115
View
-
0
Download
-
1
Crossref
|
E-submission
KFS
