-
Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Compression Hip screw on Treatment of Elderly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractrues
-
Ik Su Choi, Su In Roh, Dae Yeon Kim, Keun Il Lee, Seung Chan Ko
-
J Korean Soc Fract 2000;13(1):56-63. Published online January 31, 2000
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2000.13.1.56
-
-
 Abstract
 PDF
- PURPOSE
To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and compression hip screw on elderly with unstable intertrochanteric fractures We evaluated the clinical results of 65-year or older elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures between Jan. 1993 to Dec. 1997. 23 patients underwent compression hip screw treatment and 19 patients were treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Functional evaluation was conducted at 3, 6 and 12 month after the operation by hip rating scale of Merle d'Aubigne. Complications, time to weight bearing and hospitalization period were also investigated.
RESULTS
For the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, functional scale of good or above were seen in 74%, 72% and 67% of the group at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. However in the compression hip screw group, the good or above results were shown in 57%, 52% and 43% of the group, thus showing a functional deterioration as time progresses. Comparing the overall clinical outcome, the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed better results, complication occurred in 26 cases of compression hip screw group and 8 cases of bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, showing better outcomes in the bipolar hemiarthroplasty group.
CONCLUSION
Comparing the length of hospital stay, time to weight bearing, complication and functional superiority of the treatment for elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed superior clinical outcomes than the compression hip screw. Moreover, patients with more unstable fractures and more severe osteoporosis showed better clinical results with bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
-
A Comparision of conservative and Operative Treatmene in the Bony Mallet Finger
-
Ik Su Choi, Su In Roh, Hong Ju Ha, Jin Goo Kang, Dae Yeon Kim
-
J Korean Soc Fract 1999;12(4):1021-1026. Published online October 31, 1999
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.1999.12.4.1021
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Mallet finger is a commom deformity caused by disruption of the extensor mechnism at the dorsal base of the distal phalanx.
Patients can by managed by either conservative or operative treatment depending on some factors, such as the fracture type and interval from injury to medical treatment. However, whether to perform conservative or operative treatment is in debate.
We conducted this study to compare the results of conservative and operative treatment of mallet finger caused by intra-articular fracture of the distal phalanx, with not mere than one third of the articular surface of the distal phalanx involved.
From March 1994 to April 1999, we experienced 26 cases of bony mallet fingers. Following are the results.
1. The result by Kanies scale was satisfactory in 9 cases of 12 in conservative treatment(75%), and 10 cases of 14 in operative treatment(71%)(P>0.05).
2. The result was satisfactory in 8 cases of 10 in patients who were treated within 2 weeks(80%), and 4 cases of 7 in those treated after 4 weeks(57%)(P<0.05).
3. Conservative treatment was more cost effective, easier to perform compared to operative treatment. Thus, we suggest conservative treatment as the better treatment method for bony mallet finger with ont more than one third of the articular surface of the distal phalanx involved.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Extension pin block technique versus extension orthosis for acute bony mallet finger; a retrospective comparison
Gurkan Gumussuyu, Mehmet Melih Asoglu, Olcay Guler, Hasan May, Adil Turan, Ozkan Kose
Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research.2021; 107(5): 102764. CrossRef
-
128
View
-
1
Download
-
1
Crossref
|
E-submission
KFS
