Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Beom Kim 2 Articles
Arthroscopic Treatment of The Tibial Intercondylar Eminence Fractures
Han Chul Kim, Beom Kim
J Korean Soc Fract 2000;13(3):488-493.   Published online July 31, 2000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2000.13.3.488
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
To compare operative results between pull-out wiring and retrograde screw fixation for displaced tibial intercondylar eminence fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From March 1997 to February 1999, authors carried out pull-out wiring in 3 patients and retrograde screw fixation in 5 patients who sustained typeII and typeIII displaced tibial intercondylar eminence fractures follow up for 16 months(mean).
RESULTS
The Union time was mean 7 wk in pull-out wiring and 6.5 wk in retrograde screw fixation. Limitation of knee motion(1 case) developed in retrograde screw fixation group and reoperated for adhesiolysis. Pull-out wiring group were all full motion recovered. Anterior instability(1 case) developed in retrograde screw fixation group and pull-out wiring group had no instability. Operation time for retrograde screw fixation group was mean 98min and pull-out wiring group was 105 min.
CONCLUSION
The outcome of pull-out wiring group were superior to retrograde screw fixation group. It can be stably fixed and allow early motion exercise. Besides, in case of small bony fragment, it is difficult for fixation with screw. And even impossible. In child cases, the multiple percutaneous pinning can lead to good result. So authors believe that pull-out wiring is worthy for tibial intercondylar eminence fracture.
  • 89 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer
Effects of Fibular Fixation for Interlocking Nailing of Distal Tibiofibular Fractures
Sang Ho Moon, Phil Hyun Chung, Chung Soo Hwang, Dong Ju Chae, Beom Kim
J Korean Soc Fract 2000;13(2):296-302.   Published online April 30, 2000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12671/jksf.2000.13.2.296
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
: To compare redioiogic results between interlocking intramedullary nail with fibular fixation and nail only for treating distal tibiofibular diaphyseal fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
: From April 1993 to February 1999, 26 distal tibiofibular fractures were antegrade nailed after anatomical reduction and fixation of fibular fractures, and another 61 fractures fixed with nails only. Average age of patients was 41.8 years. These two groups were compared by frequency of malalignment, degree of postoperative angulation, angulation according to comminution, angulation according to fracture configuration. The statistical analysis was evaluated by t-test.
RESULTS
: Fibular fixation group had no malalignment while non-fixations had angulation of 1.2+/-1.1 degree and non-fixation had 3.0+/-2.1. So fixation had lessor angulation than non-fixation significantly(p=0.004). In lateral rediographs, each had 1.3+/- 1.1, 2.8+/-2.3 degree and showed significant difference(p=0.027). In type I and II fractures of Winquist-Hansen classification, fixation group showed lesser degree of angulation in A-P plane significantly(p=0.008) but no significant difference in lateral plane. In type III and IV, no significant difference in both planes. According to configuration of fractures, transverse and spiral fractures showed no significant differences but oblique configurations had significant differences in A-P plane(p=0.002) CONCLUSION : Interlocking intramedullary nail with fibular fixation has the advantage in maintenance of alignment during insertion of nail in distal tibiofibular fractures, especially in Winquist-Hansen classification type I and II and oblique fractures in anteroposterior plane, so it can be a worthy method for the treatment of distal tibiofibular diaphyseal fractures.
  • 105 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

J Musculoskelet Trauma : Journal of Musculoskeletal Trauma
Close layer
TOP