Surgical Treatment for Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures in Elderly Patients – Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Approach and Extensile Lateral Approach –

Article information

J Musculoskelet Trauma. 2019;32(3):135-142
Publication date (electronic) : 2019 January 10
doi : https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.3.135
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Correspondence to: Jong-Min Baik, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 21565, Korea Tel: +82-32-460-3384 Fax: +82-32-423-3384 E-mail: bbaik98@gmail.com
Received 2018 December 31; Revised 2019 January 29; Accepted 2019 May 27.

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose

As the functional demands for activities in elderly patients are increasing according to their life extension, the need for surgical treatment is also increasing in elderly patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. In addition to the extensile lateral approach (ELA), which is a surgical procedure that showed good results on intra-articular calcaneal fractures, the minimally invasive approach (MIA) also showed an outstanding result. This study compared the radiological and clinical results of intra-articular calcaneus fractures in elderly patients in two groups: ELA and MIA.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients aged over 65 years with intra-articular calcaneus fractures, who could be followed-up more than 14 months, were included in this study. Thirteen patients of the MIA group and 17 patients of the ELA group were analyzed retrospectively using radiological and clinical assessments.

Results

No significant difference in union time, posterior facet reduction accuracy, subtalar osteoarthritis frequency, Bohler angle, calcaneal width, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, visual analogue scale score, 36–item short form survey, and foot function index was observed between the two groups. The p-value of the average height of the calcaneus correction, average length of calcaneal correction, and average loss of correction length were <0.001, 0.005, and 0.015, respectively. The incidence of complications, including soft tissue necrosis and bone infection, were 23.1% in the ELA group and none in the MIA group.

Conclusion

The clinical outcomes were similar in the two groups. The degree of reduction of fracture showed a better result in the MIA group than the ELA group. Furthermore, there were no complications in the MIA group, whereas the ELA group showed some complications.

Fig. 1.

Minimally invasive approach. (A, C, E) Lateral radiographs of the calcaneus. (B, D, F) Axial radiographs of the calcaneus.

Fig. 2.

Extensile lateral approach. (A) Lateral radiograph of the calcaneus. (B) Axial radiograph of the calcaneus.

Fig. 3.

(A) Lateral radiograph of the calcaneus shows measurements of the Böhler angle, calcaneal height, calcaneal length. (B) Axial radiograph of the calcaneus shows measurements of the calcaneal width.

Comparison of the Demographic Data and Clinical Outcome between the Treatment Groups

Comparison of the Radiologic Outcomes between the Treatment Groups

References

1. Järvholm U, Körner L, Thorén O, Wiklund LM. Fractures of the calcaneus. A comparison of open and closed treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 55:652–656. 1984;
2. Su J, Cao X. Can operations achieve good outcomes in elderly patients with Sanders II-III calcaneal fractures? Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e7553. 2017;
3. Gaskill T, Schweitzer K, Nunley J. Comparison of surgical outcomes of intraarticular calcaneal fractures by age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2884–2889. 2010;
4. Sanders R. Displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:225–250. 2000;
5. Basile A. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures in elderly patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 49:25–32. 2010;
6. Herscovici D Jr, Widmaier J, Scaduto JM, Sanders RW, Walling A. Operative treatment of calcaneal fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1260–1264. 2005;
7. Hatzokos I, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P, Dimitriou C, Christodoulou A, Pournaras J. Treatment of intraarticular comminuted os calcis fractures. Orthopedics 29:25–29. 2006;
8. Khorbi A, Chebil M, Ben Maitigue M, et al. [Screw fixation without bone graft of calcaneal joint fractures: 35 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:45–51. 2006;French.
9. McGarvey WC, Burris MW, Clanton TO, Melissinos EG. Calcaneal fractures: indirect reduction and external fixation. Foot Ankle Int 27:494–499. 2006;
10. Schepers T, Patka P. Treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures by ligamentotaxis: current concepts' review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1677–1683. 2009;
11. Mittlmeier T, Morlock MM, Hertlein H, et al. Analysis of morphology and gait function after intraarticular calcaneal fracture. J Orthop Trauma 7:303–310. 1993;
12. Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ. Extensive intraarticular fractures of the foot. Surgical management of calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:128–134. 1993;
13. Boack DH, Wichelhaus A, Mittlmeier T, Hoffmann R, Haas NP. [Therapy of dislocated calcaneus joint fracture with the AO calcaneus plate]. Chirurg 69:1214–1223. 1998;German.
14. Letournel E. Open treatment of acute calcaneal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:60–67. 1993;
15. Zwipp H, Tscherne H, Thermann H, Weber T. Osteosynthesis of displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus. Results in 123 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:76–86. 1993;
16. Dhillon MS, Bali K, Prabhakar S. Controversies in calcaneus fracture management: a systematic review of the literature. Musculoskelet Surg 95:171–181. 2011;
17. Folk JW, Starr AJ, Early JS. Early wound complications of operative treatment of calcaneus fractures: analysis of 190 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 13:369–372. 1999;
18. Burdeaux BD. Reduction of calcaneal fractures by the McReyn-olds medial approach technique and its experimental basis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177:87–103. 1983;
19. Mann RA. Arthrodesis of the foot and ankle. In : Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL, eds. Surgery of the foot and ankle. Vol 1 8th ed.th ed. Philadelphia, Mosby: 1091–1123; 2007.
20. Kline AJ, Anderson RB, Davis WH, Jones CP, Cohen BE. Minimally invasive technique versus an extensile lateral approach for intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int 34:773–780. 2013;
21. Weber M, Lehmann O, Sägesser D, Krause F. Limited open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1608–1616. 2008;
22. Hospodar P, Guzman C, Johnson P, Uhl R. Treatment of displaced calcaneus fractures using a minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach. Orthopedics 31:1112. 2008;
23. Johal HS, Buckley RE, Le IL, Leighton RK. A prospective randomized controlled trial of a bioresorbable calcium phosphate paste (alpha-BSM) in treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. J Trauma 67:875–882. 2009;
24. Longino D, Buckley RE. Bone graft in the operative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: is it helpful? J Orthop Trauma 15:280–286. 2001;
25. Su Y, Chen W, Zhang T, Wu X, Wu Z, Zhang Y. Bohler's angle's role in assessing the injury severity and functional outcome of internal fixation for displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a retrospective study. BMC Surg 13:40. 2013;
26. Gonzalez TA, Lucas RC, Miller TJ, Gitajn IL, Zurakowski D, Kwon JY. Posterior facet settling and changes in Bohler's angle in operatively and nonoperatively treated calcaneus fractures. Foot Ankle Int 36:1297–1309. 2015;
27. Backes M, Dorr MC, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T. Predicting loss of height in surgically treated displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus. Int Orthop 40:513–518. 2016;
28. Stulik J, Stehlik J, Rysavy M, Wozniak A. Minimally-invasive treatment of intraarticular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1634–1641. 2006;
29. Sanders R, Fortin P, DiPasquale T, Walling A. Operative treatment in 120 displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Results using a prognostic computed tomography scan classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:87–95. 1993;
30. Ceccarelli F, Calderazzi F, Pedrazzi G. Is there a relation between AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and SF-36 in evaluation of Achilles ruptures treated by percutaneous technique? J Foot Ankle Surg 53:16–21. 2014;

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Minimally invasive approach. (A, C, E) Lateral radiographs of the calcaneus. (B, D, F) Axial radiographs of the calcaneus.

Fig. 2.

Extensile lateral approach. (A) Lateral radiograph of the calcaneus. (B) Axial radiograph of the calcaneus.

Fig. 3.

(A) Lateral radiograph of the calcaneus shows measurements of the Böhler angle, calcaneal height, calcaneal length. (B) Axial radiograph of the calcaneus shows measurements of the calcaneal width.

Table 1.

Comparison of the Demographic Data and Clinical Outcome between the Treatment Groups

Variable Extensile lateral approach (n=13) Minimally invasive approach (n=17) p-value
Mean age (yr) 67.7±2.2 71.4±4.5 0.031
Sex; male/female 12:1 10:7 0.123
BMD (T-score) –1.9±0.6 –2.0±1.6 0.320
Sanders type (II:III) 7:6 10:7 0.837
Union time (wk) 17.0±2.3 16.1±0.6 0.245
Subtalar OA (%) 6 (46.2) 5 (29.4) 0.680
VAS score 20.0±28.6 15.3±16.7 0.869
AOFAS score 90.1±12.4 88.5±9.7 0.432
SF-36 66.0±8.6 70.9±5.2 0.229
FFI 19.5±15.2 17.5±9.2 0.805
Complication 3 (23.1) 0 (0) 0.300

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, number only, or number (%). BMD: bone mineral density, OA: osteoarthritis, VAS: visual analogue scale, AOFAS score: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot score, SF-36: 36-item short form survey, FFI: foot function index.

Table 2.

Comparison of the Radiologic Outcomes between the Treatment Groups

Variable Extensile lateral approach (n=13) Minimally invasive approach (n=17) p-value
Posterior facet reduction accuracy (Ana+Near rly) 76.9 94.1 0.432
Böhler angle (°)      
Postop correction 22.3±15.8 19.0±9.6 >0.999
Degree of loss during F/U –4.3±6.0 –6.4±5.0 0.053
Difference from the other side –2.9±7.1 –6.2±6.2 0.113
Height (mm)      
Postop correction 7.4±3.4 1.9±3.5 <0.001
Degree of loss during F/U –3.9±3.2 –2.2±2.2 0.133
Difference from the other side 2.5±2.7 –2.3±2.5 <0.001
Width (mm)      
Postop correction –4.2±4.9 –3.3±2.9 0.363
Degree of loss during F/U –1.0±2.9 0.1±0.5 0.805
Difference from the other side 1.9±3.0 1.0±1.5 0.967
Length (mm)      
Postop correction 3.0±2.1 1.1±1.6 0.005
Degree of loss during F/U –4.4±3.9 –1.4±1.9 0.015
Difference from the other side 0.6±3.1 –1.2±2.0 0.053
Values are presented as percent only or mean±standard deviation. Ana: anatomical, Nearly: nearly anatomical, Postop: postoperative, up. F/U: follow-