Results after Less Invasive Locking Plating in Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Femur

Article information

J Musculoskelet Trauma. 2019;32(1):14-20
Publication date (electronic) : 2019 January 10
doi : https://doi.org/10.12671/jkfs.2019.32.1.14
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
Correspondence to: Hee Gon Park, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, 201 Manghyang-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31116, Korea Tel: +82-41-550-6290 Fax: +82-41-556-0551 E-mail: osdku@dankook.ac.kr
Received 2018 April 29; Revised 2018 September 26; Accepted 2018 October 16.

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes after a less invasive locking plating technique in intra-articular fractures of the distal femur.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective 19 case series of patients with distal femoral intra-articular fractures treated with a less invasive locking plating technique in a single center (Dankook University Hospital) from June 2010 to April 2016. Nineteen patients (11 males and 8 females) with a mean age of 55.9 years were enrolled. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), range of knee joint motion (flexion & extension), and Knee Society score. The radiology outcomes were evaluated with parameters measured in a plain radiograph (deviation angle of alignment axis on coronal and sagittal plane, mechanical lateral distal femur angle).

Results

The mean follow-up period was 26.4 months (range, 12–72 months) and the mean duration to union was 15.94 weeks (range, 11–28 weeks). The mean VAS was 1.36 (range, 0–8) and the range of motion of the knee joint was extension 4.73° (range, 0°-30°) and flexion 107.36° (range, 60°-135°). The mean Knee Society score was 85.47 (range, 47–100). The mean deviation angle of the coronal alignment axis was 4.07° (range, 1.3°-8.8°), the mean deviation angle of the sagittal alignment axis was 3.23° (range, 0.7°-7.0°), and the mechanical lateral femoral angle was 87.75° (range, 82.8°-95.5°). Six patients had traumatic osteoarthritis at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of intraar-ticular fractures of the distal femur in patients who underwent an anatomical reduction through an open reduction, and converted to an extra-articular fracture with rigid internal fixation. The results were relatively satisfactory.

Fig. 1.

Simple radiographs show anterior-posterior and lateral view of distal femur fractures: AO/OTA classification. (A, B) type C1 fracture, (C, D) type C2 fracture, (E, F) type C3 fracture.

Fig. 2.

Intraoperative photograph showing the lateral parapatella approach for articular exposure and reconstruction.

Fig. 3.

Following reduction, an appropriate-sized plate was slid in a distal-to-proximal direction over the periosteum at the lateral aspect of the distal femur.

Fig. 4.

Intraoperative radiograph (using C-arm) for check the alignment of the distal femur and positioning of the plate.

Fig. 5.

Preoperative and immediate postoperative X-rays: anteroposterior (A, C), lateral view (B, D).

Fig. 6.

Radiological changes in osteoarthritis at the final follow-up after the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for a distal femur complete intra-articular fracture.

Demographic Data

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes at the Final Follow-Up

References

1. Hutson JJ Jr, Zych GA. Treatment of comminuted intraarticular distal femur fractures with limited internal and external tensioned wire fixation. J Orthop Trauma 14:405–413. 2000;
2. Ramesh LJ, Rajkumar SA, Rajendra R, Rajagopal HP, Phanee-sha MS, Gaurav S. Ilizarov ring fixation and fibular strut grafting for C3 distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12:91–95. 2004;
3. Lin D, Chen C, Lian K, Zhai W. Treatment of type C3.3 distal femoral fractures with double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 24:683–686. 2010;
4. Zhang ZM, Liu J, Huang CX, Zhao ZF, Wang G, Qin CC. Treatment of type C3 distal femoral fractures with double-plating fixation via anteriormiddle approach. Zhongguo Gu Shang 25:1049–1052. 2012;
5. Khalil AE, Ayoub MA. Highly unstable complex C3-type distal femur fracture: can double plating via a modified Olerud extensile approach be a standby solution? J Orthop Traumatol 13:179–188. 2012;
6. Sîrbu PD, Asaftei R, Petreuş T, Lupaşcu C, Puha B, Luncă S. Transarticular approach and retrograde plate osteosynthesis (TARPO) using implants with angular stability: a series of 17 cases of complex distal femoral fractures type C3/AO. Chirurgia (Bucur) 109:233–237. 2014;
7. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Bertram R, Holmes W, Tscherne H. Transarticular joint reconstruction and indirect plate osteosynthesis for complex distal supracondylar femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A31–41. 1997;
8. Kregor PJ. Distal femur fractures with complex articular involvement: management by articular exposure and submuscular fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 33:153–175. ix,. 2002;
9. Egund N, Kolmert L. Deformities, gonarthrosis and function after distal femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 53:963–974. 1982;
10. Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GM, Sierevelt IN, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Intra-articular fractures of the distal femur: a longterm follow-up study of surgically treated patients. J Orthop Trauma 18:213–219. 2004;
11. Zehntner MK, Marchesi DG, Burch H, Ganz R. Alignment of supracondylar/intercondylar fractures of the femur after internal fixation by AO/ASIF technique. J Orthop Trauma 6:318–326. 1992;
12. Krettek C, Müller M, Miclau T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC14–23. 2001;
13. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, Frenk A, Gilbert S, Schavan R. The development of the distal femur less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC24–31. 2001;
14. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:252–257. 2004;
15. Schandelmaier P, Blauth M, Krettek C. Osteosynthese distaler femurfrakturen mit dem less invasive stabilizing system (LISS). Oper Orthop Traumatol 13:178–197. 2001;
16. Schütz M, Schäfer M, Bail H, Wenda K, Haas N. Neue osteo-syntheseverfahren bei distalen femurfrakturen. Zentralbl Chir 130:307–313. 2005;
17. Goesling T, Frenk A, Appenzeller A, Garapati R, Marti A, Krettek C. LISS PLT: design, mechanical and biomechanical characteristics. Injury 34(Suppl 1):A11–15. 2003;
18. Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:353–360. 2013;
19. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma 13:401–406. 1999;
20. Colborn GL, Mattar SG, Taylor B, Skandalalkis JE, Lumsden AB. The surgical anatomy of the deep femoral artery. Am Surg 61:336–346. 1995;
21. Rhinelander FW. The normal microcirculation of diaphyseal cortex and its response to fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:784–800. 1968;
22. Ehlinger M, Adam P, Di Marco A, Arlettaz Y, Moor BK, Bonnomet F. Periprosthetic femoral fractures treated by locked plating: feasibility assessment of the mini-invasive surgical option. A prospective series of 36 fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:622–628. 2011;

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Simple radiographs show anterior-posterior and lateral view of distal femur fractures: AO/OTA classification. (A, B) type C1 fracture, (C, D) type C2 fracture, (E, F) type C3 fracture.

Fig. 2.

Intraoperative photograph showing the lateral parapatella approach for articular exposure and reconstruction.

Fig. 3.

Following reduction, an appropriate-sized plate was slid in a distal-to-proximal direction over the periosteum at the lateral aspect of the distal femur.

Fig. 4.

Intraoperative radiograph (using C-arm) for check the alignment of the distal femur and positioning of the plate.

Fig. 5.

Preoperative and immediate postoperative X-rays: anteroposterior (A, C), lateral view (B, D).

Fig. 6.

Radiological changes in osteoarthritis at the final follow-up after the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique for a distal femur complete intra-articular fracture.

Table 1.

Demographic Data

Characteristic Value
Age (yr) 55.9 (32–79)
Sex (male:female) 11:8
Injury mechanism (low:high energy) 4:15
Fracture type (AO/OTA classification)  
  C1 2
  C2 4
  C3 13

Values are presented as median (range) or number only.

Table 2.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes at the Final Follow-Up

Parameter Median (range)
The time to union (wk) 15.94 (11–28)
VAS (0–10) 1.36 (0–8)
Range of motion (o)  
  Extension 4.73 (0–30)
  Flexion 107.36 (60–135)
Knee Society score (0–100) 85.47 (47–100)
Coronal alignment difference (o) 4.07 (1.3–8.8)
Sagittal alignment difference (o) 3.23 (0.7–7.0)
Mechanical lateral distal femur angle (o) 87.75 (82.8–95.5)